Women are ruining everything for everyone. you know it's tr…

It's complicated...

The ego of women (not all) has been used against them to weaponise them against men by telling them they are victims of oppression, which is, of course, absurd.

Men are the only real danger to tyranny therefore they are under attack.

My huge arsenal of weaponry and ammo makes me more of a threat to tyranny than most men.

I believe that.

But from the POV of totalitarians, if you had to identify the group that is the greatest danger to your plans, the group that is willing and able to defend liberty and individual rights, the group you want to weaken... wouldn't it be men?

Debatable. Generally speaking, yes, but more specifically I'd want to weaken the liberty loving, free thinking, and heavily armed folks and that includes women. There's a lot of anti gun / pro feminism guys out there. They are of little concern.

Debatable. Generally speaking, yes, but more specifically I'd want to weaken the liberty loving, free thinking, and heavily armed folks and that includes women. There's a lot of anti gun / pro feminism guys out there. They are of little concern.

Agreed. I'd weaken men in general and freedom minded groups specifically

Another aspect is that weakening one sex weakens both in the long run.

In my view the anti-gun pro-feminist men you speak of are the result of the attack on masculinity (feminism, collectivism).

So yes. It has worked like a charm.

agree all - the cultural marxist prefers to manipulate the emotional orientation of (most) women. By depriving their reason, they've weaponized them. These women destroy the family, which leaves men purposeless. Purposeless men destroy themselves

It wasn't long ago that a woman couldn't get a divorce without their husband's permission. Even in the 80s domestic abuse was considered a private matter and women had little recourse.

This process starts with 10 year old girls.
If the cultural marxist succeeds with 7 out of 10 women, they've won basically.
Even if 2 out of 10 women stay normie and 1 out of 10 is based, doesn't matter much. Great to have 1 out of 10 helping tho

Now that men have to step up and be good faithful husbands, they want to blame women instead of bettering themselves. If you want a good woman, be a good man.

my comment wasn't referring to divorce at all. My use of phrase 'destroy the family' unrelated.
A marriage is two people, both of free will and responsibility.

The cultural marxist agenda is to destroy the whole civilization- what I am talking about.

If you are interested here's the woman who single handedly changed my views on gender relations:

https://youtu.be/w__PJ8ymliw

Otherwise I agree. Only good men can hope to find good women and vice versa.

Sorry, I assumed you were speaking in relation to the OP. My statement goes both ways, BTW. If a woman wants to keep a good man, she needs to be a better woman.

since we are making broad claims...
review 1000s of years of human history, Christian societies in Western Civilization gave women greater self-determination than any other.
Yet, these are precisely the societies the Cultural Marxist aims to destroy.

It's not enough for a male to be a good man in the last 30 years. The social ground has shifted so far.
Many good guys who are socially at the low end of the curve will never get a good woman. He's got to be two fold- socially adept and good.

Self determination can't be granted to men or women, it can only be suppressed by societies by varying degrees. That said, I agree that western Christian civilizations suppressed women's autonomy less than all others. Cultural Marxism is the enemy.

Society was previously structured for optimal pairing of a man and a woman. Say whatever about it, from a societal perspective was objectively better for social structure. We're never going back.

Optimal pairing for men, yes, what was best for women was of little concern. That's why they'd arrange marriages between a 14 year old girl and a 40 year old man. Thank god we aren't going back.

I'm not seeing a problem here. Women have to be both of those things too if they want to get and keep a good man. Better yourself if you want a good partner.

How it works: women basically chose their mate...
30% of women have determined they won't ever have a good normal life by their actions (regardless of what they say they want), which leaves 30% of men wanting a good normal life but can't get it.

You're assuming all men want a good normal life and you're just making up percentages. People choose each other, but it is still customary for the man to propose to the woman so if anyone is choosing anyone, it's men choosing their mate.

Young women wield far more social power than they can handle. Social pressure on them is good, but hopefully its coming from parents.

Most young men are broke. They wield no power. They're entirely disposable. Societies sends them off to war and death.

If you can trace your ancestors back to Europe for centuries out to 1000s of people, I'd bet you cannot find a single forced marriage of an under-16 year old girl to an over-30 man in your family tree.

I like this lady is she single? Hook a homie up lol

Dont like that her name is karen though oh geez ill defend her though 😂😂