woah wtf (h/t @107 ) https://twitter.com/cartwheelsam/statu…

@ProfessorBekenstein " I feel curious as to how you resolve your Pi dependency? The way you have it written, your information density limits are procedural system limitations. Was that your intention?"

Prof: The answer is funding, always. More funding.

Me: "Perhaps I understand. You are establishing the limits of information density in terms of exchange rates with it$elf exchanging it$elf with it$elf? Measured against a substrateless pure $self?"

Prof: Funding, the answer is always more funding.

Me: "Yes, funding. What I do not understand here are your base units of funding? You have Square Seconds' Kelvin per Kilogram Square Meters. How can a second be square? How can a square meter have mass?"

Prof: Funding, the answer is always more funding.

Me: "Yes Professor, I get your point. Though for me to construct the system, I must understand the fuel source [FUNDING]."

Prof: "Ah, I see now. You are looking at the Kolmogorovian Complexity limitations of the $elf($elf). Self within the self."

"How can seconds be square", you say?

well, if a second can be a cube, than of course it can be a square! the real question is how can a second be a cube

Prof: "My equation posits that the DNA basis protocol [Pi_eater] exists as the Bekenstein-Kolmogorovian Complexity limitation of it$elf. The boundary condition occurs as the irreducible, thus defines the funding parameter."

Prof_cont: "DNA occurs as the most complex known structure in existence and cannot be expressed in a more succinct manner than it$elf. The $elf($elf) (self within the self) recursion exists as the funding convertor."

Me: I see. Thus your units "Per Square Seconds' Kelvin, are boundary condition step sums of exchange within a Bolztmannian parametric metric metricity governed by thermionic degeneration?"

Prof: Yes, the thermionic degenerate affords Minkowskian validity.

Prof: Yes, though "Bolztmannian Parametric Metric Metricity" comes off as gibberish to the Euclidean "Dub_stepped" mind. When you place evolving metricity's inside metricized recursions inside unmetricized recursions, you'll need a stepwise bit framing.

Me: I see. Thank you for explaining it to me Professor.

Prof: Show me?

Me: The charge invariant may be gauged as charge invariant per unit spacetime with spacetime gauged as the charge invariant units per unit. The gauge which gauges the gauge.

Prof: Yes, you understand. The answer is always "More Funding". Remember, there exists ONLY ONE UNIVERSAL Pi. Which, as a transcendent encapsulates all other LOCAL Pi. When you see "Pi" you may say: "Valid up to a point."

feels

https://twetch.app/t/981f022159404d24afc3ac2d0070a4f2041800db99814b97c10a094693a78bf6

Me: Therefore the funding incremental are contiguity displacements?

Prof: We'll come back to that. For now, as say in the hive "Let us go shake our money makers" and get the focus back on funding.

/fund @2518 $218

now what would cracker think of this?

Gravity forgives naught.

yes sir, understood. who forgives gravity tho?

Clarification request: Did you mean to say who forgives mean gravity's tho?