Y ·
The more I watch Harris and the media reacting to her hilarious ignorance, the more I think it's a done deal. The rulers will select Trump and he'll do Iran, mobilize the patriots and convince conservatards that the republic is still alive. But if this is true, the warnings of the democrats that democracy is lost if Trump wins must be at least partly be proven right. How could this play out? Well, they could create massive social unrest by using the pro Islam, pro Palestine sentiment when Trump goes after Iran, suddenly become the "anti-war" front again, take to the streets doing what they do best, burning and looting, and Trump reacts with lockdowns, martial law etc. Cheered on by the former anti-lockdown "right". Divide and rule is a fascinating game, gotta admit it. I obviously don't know the future. I just share opinions that go against the two accepted narratives.
Replies
steffenkd ·
Have similar thoughts.
steffenkd ·
Not sure, but I think the insanity and stupidity of the left could be on purpose to push "the right" in most western societies. And because of all the violence, society will thankfully welcome martial law or other stuff to reestablish law and order which was kinda unimaginable before.
Y ·
The "right" used to be concerned about government overreach, martial law etc. But now that they perceive the left as a threat to "our republic" they are on board with pretty much anything that makes them feel safe. Just think of the Q community... their wet dream is the military taking over and guillotining the "enemies". On the "left" it's the same. They are so afraid to lose "our democracy" to "fascism" that they accept all kinds of totalitarian measures they would have rejected not so long ago. If you get both sides to think that the other is trying to kill them, you can do whatever you want.
steffenkd ·
Yep, at that point for most people the end justifies the means and they simply become what they fight against.