Twetch direly needs some users I can disagree with. The cir…

I’m sure I can think of some topics that you’ll disagree with. I’m pretty good at playing the devil’s advocate. Want to do a follow for follow? Also, you might disagree with this guy @7346 . 😈👿👹👺🎃

followed

Shitcoins and communism go figure

Glad I could be your first follower. I swipe so much that sometimes I have to wait before it lets me keep swiping. Haha! What are some of your interests? I’ll see if I can direct you to the correct or confrontational channels.

TRON, XRP, DeFi. ETH and Universal Basic Income

Are these things you agree with or disagree with?

Stay salty, fashist.

Do you support universal basic income? If so, would basic income include more than needed just to cover the minimum food requirements with limited choice in options, and the smallest living quarters possible unless the recipient is willing to work for more

I support UBI in theory but not if it requires the mark of the beast.

But again, how basic is that income and what can it be spent on? If you give people $1000 a month and they spend it on heroine, booze and cigarettes, you have done nothing to better their life or society. You have only stolen from the responsible to give

to the irresponsible... this can only hurt a society...

In theory they would be able to spend it on anything but you have to remember that eventually all money will be digital and traceable. The few people who would try to get away with that would be caught very easily when that time comes.

you mean the federal reserve system which offers uses no choice but to take and give to the irresponsible. why do think the world's in such state. UBI at least offers the poorest of poor, that genuinely want equality a much better chance of achieving it.

Obviously I have no love for the federal reserve or any centralized fractional reserve banking system. That said, any monetary system, no matter how fair, that steals from the responsible and productive to give to the unproductive should have massive

limitations on who that money can be spent. I agree that a system of real money that is transparent and reduces corruption would lift more people out of poverty, but there will always be those that simply refuse to work. He who WILL NOT work should not eat

"He who WILL NOT work should not eat"
Does your dictum apply to those who inherited their wealth and refuse to work?

he who will not work-not eat ok. when you are aware the system is corrupt in all manners such as you clearly are, many are not. which stage do you consider being part of, or working with, the problem. poor is not a mindset. UBI might create more geniuses

oh you evil bastard

iKant believe you said that, this is not about the privileged 😋

No, it applies to those who refuse to work and would demand the money to eat from those who do work... If I work hard my whole life and want to leave my excess money and/or property to my children when I die, no one has a right to stop that.

There will have to be a collapse and a monetary reset. It is coming and coming fast. If a transparent monetary system is introduced and wealth is distributed as fairly as possible from the outset giving all a livable income to start, no UBI system would

be needed, nor should one be instituted. If you are given a fair income to start and fail from there, it should not be the responsibility of others to provide for you unless it is in charitable or loan form.

all "if's" aside, there is no "fair" in this world but there could be a bottom line with UBI it won't take away your work savings you have Ag47

It is a baseline to help avoid lifelong situations of extreme poverty for those born into it, don't blame them

I would have no problem with a base initial income for those born into poverty do to irresponsible parents, however an ongoing monthly base income only promotes more irresponsibility. Everyone should have a fair shot at relative success from the outset,

but should not be constantly supported by those who have achieved relative success.

good discussion either way.
if it were up to me i would employ a UBI and a UIC - income cap
(i don't want anyone getting too powerful, you understand)
the most terrible people in history most did it for money
i would cap that. greed looks bad on my books

I’m back and forth on income cap. I think it would be more beneficial to cap income in a way where maybe an employer could only earn income equivalent to that of their employees. Meaning if I employ 10 workers at $1,000 weekly salary I can only earn

$10,000 weekly. The only way I can earn more is to give employees raises. Making it a win win for all involved. Employees have incentive to do better work. And I am incentivized to pay them more to make more myself...

suddenly the bank worker who fills the free lollies bowl is a trillionaire lol. it is a good start. but it might not change much without a final capped amount. i bags the lollies jar job 1st