Replies
Twetch ·
National socialism is traditionally racist and has a tendency to concetration camps...
They don't look dumb defending it, they are just being honest about their disgusting ideology.
Twetch ·
I was talking of tankies (authoritarian communists) not Nazis (fascists), tankies say they want equality and then defend this while Nazis are openly against equality
Twetch ·
Aren't China and North Korea National Socialist countries?
I mean you could argue that socialism is becoming international as we speak, but still nothing official.
Twetch ·
To me they are all Nacos (Nazi-Communists).
Twetch ·
Ok, looked at your profile...
Now I understand.
Since you don't know what to do, maybe listen to your compatriot clearing things up:
https://youtu.be/WhT_kA8EtYE
Twetch ·
Lol what you call "nacos" has a real name: tankies. And it's wrong to label them Nazis because Nazism is a very defined ideology that doesn't apply to those countries, but I agree that they have fascist tendencies
Twetch ·
I've given up on diferetiating between different brands of collectivism... not my problem, they can figure it out between themselves. Commies, Tankies, Nazis, socialists, marxists...
What they have all in common is they hate freedom and the individual.
Twetch ·
Another thing they have in common is complete lack of awareness that everything they do ends up a nightmare.
Feeling morally superior can really make you blind to your own evil.
They seem like Borg to me who live under the illusion of being Jedi knights.
Twetch ·
And let us not leave out the technocrats. The type Aldous Huxley warmed us about. They all desire to control humanity. Perhaps we should name them all under one umbrella term: the controllers.
Twetch ·
The urge to control everything around us has always the same root: fear.
Hilariously most of them probably think they are trying to save the world... out of love.
Twetch ·
You guys have no idea, do you? I mean horseshoe theory has no political validity whatsoever and if you can't differentiate between authoritarian right wing people and libertarian left wing people you should probably educate yourself about the matter...
Twetch ·
The problem is nobody understands and hasn't read enough Marx, I know.
I'd respect collectivists a lot more if they wouldn't pretend to be interested in freedom and just say it:
'We don't care about freedom, we want a big mommy."
Twetch ·
Question! What wing are sovereign individuals on? No government. Natural law. Cause and Effect. Aggregate morality. Fuck both wings wanting to dominate the individual.
Twetch ·
But yes, maybe there is a 'libertarian' 'left winger' somewhere who genuinly believes in individual rights (including private property) and freedom.
If you are one of those, I'm intrigued!
Twetch ·
I'd say they're the torso, or at least switch wings often.
Twetch ·
I'd say there's a statist vampire sucking people dry to keep them under control.
That vampire has two wings, left and right.
It can only stay in the air as long as those two wings are flapping, if they stop, it crashes to the ground.
Twetch ·
/pay @28077 $0.12 in case you are lacking funds to answer.
This is a voluntary transactions ;)
No rights have been violated.
Twetch ·
Lemme tell you, most leftists (me included) are libertarian, our ground principle is freedom of opportunity for everyone, the two biggest socialist ideologies are anarcho(!)- communism and Marxim (the state has some power in the beginning which decreases)
Twetch ·
(over time) socialism has to be libertarian since its goal, communism is literally defined as a moneyless, classless and stateless society
Twetch ·
So the scary authoritarian communist is in 90% of the cases a strawman argument
Twetch ·
There's just a little problem: Reality
Giving the state more power doesn't make it go away, it makes it worse
The idea that it would be any different is akin to arguing that if you give all your weapons and resources to the invading army it will go away.
Twetch ·
I have no problem whatsoever with any kind of collectivism that is VOLUNTARY.
On the contrary! I encourage all collectivists to buy land, means of production etc, work together, share - and leave others alone.
You know, live and let live...
Twetch ·
But that seems to be the exception...
Instead they grow the state apparatus, destroy the economy, and are all about 'sharing' other people's resources without their consent.
Socialism is radical statism promising a stateless society that never comes.
Twetch ·
I see your point, but it's currently kinda impossible to just whip a commune out of your back pocket, since money still rules the world. We don't want the state to get more power, but change it to set the tracks towards a more equal society with its
Twetch ·
Current amount of power so someday noone will rule over another person.
Twetch ·
The only thing we want to share is means of production and basic human needs, we want people to work for their money, not let other people work for it by taking away port of the value they create
Twetch ·
Literally the one thing socialists do is to give the state more power
Abolishing private property (slow via taxation and inflation or fast through revolution and seizing of MOP) is pure centralization of power
Talk to leftist billionaires about communes.
Twetch ·
Literally the one thing socialists do is to give the state more power
Abolishing private property (slow via taxation and inflation or fast through revolution and seizing of MOP) is pure centralization of power
Talk to leftist billionaires about communes.
Twetch ·
I know... the problem is you don't want to voluntarily share with each other, but 'share' others people's property
The problem thereis that it isn't called sharing, it's called theft.
Self-organize! Ask Soros and Gates to finance your utopia.
Twetch ·
Leftist billionaires can't exist because owning businesses goes completely against our values. Abolishing private mop doesn't necessarily mean giving it to the gov but more often to give it to the workers so they can run it democratically
Twetch ·
You either stand for liberty and individual rights, or you believe in coercion, theft etc
To think that you can violate individual (property) rights en masse and then end up anywhere else but with the greatest thief (state) controlling the loot is absurd.
Twetch ·
The end doesn't justify the means,
the means determine the outcome.
If you start a society with coercion and theft don't act surprised when it ends with even more coercion and theft (by the state).
Every single time.
Twetch ·
The real theft happening is capitalists stealing the value that workers create, and if I take away their ability to steal, it's like "stealing" a slave owner's farm and giving it to the slaves so they can get 100% of the value they create
Twetch ·
Both abuser and predator usually percieve their objective violence as only an reaction to the imagined violence they FEEL coming from their victim.
That's how the ego works...
Feel like a victim while victimizing others.
You don't believe in freedom.
Twetch ·
Larken Rose day on Twetch:
https://youtu.be/OhQelq3ACqg
Twetch ·
You don’t think the likes of George Soros is left wing?
Twetch ·
Idk shit about George Soros only that he's part of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories
Twetch ·
There seems to be a striking similarity between anti-semitic conspiracy theories and Marxism.
All you have to do is replace 'Jews' with 'Bourgeoisie' and 'Aryan' with 'Proletariat'
See how this works?
It's all about judging groups instead of individuals.
Twetch ·
The Nazis did not invent polylogism. They only developed their own brand.
https://mises.org/library/what-nazis-borrowed-marx
Twetch ·
Marx, of course, was a self-hating Jew, an anti-semite and racist, so non of this should come as a surprise...
Twetch ·
Good read!
Thank you!
/pay @908 $1
Twetch ·
We judge a group of people defined by their actions, not their unrelated identity. Its like invalidating the phrase "murderers are bad" because you could replace murderers with Jews. And I know marx was an anti-Semite but that doesn't invalidate his work
Twetch ·
Define the action that characterizes an entire segment of society like the 'bourgeoisie'.
Are they all thieves? Exploiters? Oppressors? What is it?
If you call someone part of the group 'murderers' you must have proof they murdered someone.
Twetch ·
Now the state, on the other hand, is undeniably involved in theft, exploitation and oppression.
It is basically a criminal organization, masquerading as a philanthropic institution.
You are looking for the culprit in the wrong place.
Thanks to Marx...
Twetch ·
And it is entirely understandable.
Marx was a great 'magician' he knew how to manipulate human nature like few others
Seeing the state as the culprit leads only to liberation. Seeing the 'bourgeoisie' as the culprit promises a lot of loot to be 'shared'