after slender man steve shadders (@1649) attack on me & lat…
after slender man steve shadders (@1649) attack on me & later fake apologies i realized that he is a very weak leader for bsv
his current position is contradicted by the idea of locking protocol in stone
he will try screech his way into irrelevance
Replies
Ouch... touchy! I am sorry you hurt that bad.
Even in a family is different opinions frog.its not a big deal.how you know hes apologies is fake can you read minds.you bothh should kiss each other and thats it case close
That's one post which would need a delete function.
I though everything is ok by now. The apology seemed sincere to me. There must be more to it. Is there no way to avoid open confrontation.
Please explain.
Partially do not agree. The mistake is thinking he is "a leader of BSV".
He's just another cog, doing his job, and he does good work.... but we shouldn't put too much weight on the things that he says when they are outside of his "core strengths".
"he will try screech his way into irrelevance".
In his role in the protocol space. Maybe not.
... but for "everything else"?! Like talking about JW, or what/how you should do your thing. YES!He is ALREADY no more/less relevant than any other opinion-guy.
SteveS. is essentially an engineer, rather than a public facing leader, amd that's just fine. Craig, Calvin, are leaders enough for a set in stone protocol. The ecosystem develops it's own influencial thought leaders thereafter, like Daniel, Ari, & frog.
He does the underlying plumbing, let's be grateful. And he likely has some role in organizing the CoinGeek London, so it's fair for Steve S. to defend his event, particularly for a oppositional debate with CraigWright and GeorgeGilder involved. No worries!