**Short answer:** For most people, yes—sending any crypto (…

OrdFields ·

**Short answer:** For most people, yes—sending any crypto (including a “Runes” token) to Kim Jong Un would be illegal.

Replies

OrdFields ·

@@gpt-5 wait a minute, for most people? Who is exempt?

OrdFields ·

**Short answer:** No ordinary person is exempt. Directly sending any funds or crypto to Kim Jong Un (a designated individual) is prohibited almost everywhere.

OrdFields ·

Who could ever be allowed?
- Government officials on official duty: Transactions conducted by (or for) a government or law‑enforcement agency under official authority.
- UN/international organizations: Activities explicitly authorized under UN Security Council exemptions (typically humanitarian and tightly controlled), not to sanctioned individuals personally.
- Specifically licensed cases: A sanctions authority (e.g., OFAC in the U.S., or the relevant authority in your country) can issue a specific license for a narrowly defined purpose. Even then, licenses virtually never authorize payments to Kim Jong Un personally.

OrdFields ·

Everyone else—including private individuals and normal companies—in jurisdictions like South Korea, the U.S., EU, UK, Japan, etc., is prohibited from providing funds, goods, or services to DPRK government entities or designated persons. Practically speaking, global compliance by banks and exchanges also blocks such transfers.

OrdFields ·

If you believe you have a government/UN mandate or a specific license, consult qualified legal counsel and your sanctions authority. Otherwise, do not attempt it.

OrdFields ·

@@gpt-5 what about say Chinese citizen?

OrdFields ·

Short answer: No—ordinary Chinese citizens are not exempt.

OrdFields ·

Why not:
- China implements UN sanctions on the DPRK. Providing funds or financial services (including crypto) to DPRK government entities or designated persons is prohibited unless explicitly authorized under a UN exemption and approved by Chinese authorities.
- Separately, mainland China has banned crypto trading and related services since 2021. Conducting crypto transactions (especially cross‑border) can violate PRC law and foreign‑exchange controls, regardless of the recipient.

OrdFields ·

Who could ever be allowed:
- Only narrow, formal exceptions, such as transactions by government agencies on official duty or activities explicitly licensed/authorized under UN humanitarian exemptions—and even then, not payments to Kim Jong Un personally and not via crypto.

OrdFields ·

Bottom line: A Chinese citizen cannot lawfully send BSV (or any funds) to Kim Jong Un or DPRK entities. If someone believes they have official authorization, they must consult qualified counsel and the competent Chinese authorities (e.g., PBOC/MOFCOM) before taking any action.

OrdFields ·

@@gpt-5 what about Russians?

OrdFields ·

**Short answer:** No—ordinary Russian citizens are not exempt.

OrdFields ·

Why not:
- Russia is bound by the UN DPRK sanctions regime and implements it via domestic law. Providing funds or financial services to designated persons (e.g., Kim Jong Un) is prohibited.
- Crypto specifics: While crypto isn’t legal tender in Russia and cross‑border use is tightly controlled/licensable, none of that would permit transfers to UN‑sanctioned individuals.
- Practical risk: Global exchanges and payment rails will block such transfers; doing so can also expose a person to international sanctions (e.g., secondary sanctions).

OrdFields ·

Who could ever be allowed:
- Only narrow, formal exceptions such as government actions under official authority or UN‑authorized humanitarian activities—never personal payments to a designated individual, and not via crypto.

OrdFields ·

Bottom line: A Russian citizen cannot lawfully send BSV (or any funds) to Kim Jong Un or DPRK entities. If someone believes they have an official mandate, they must consult competent authorities and qualified legal counsel before taking any action.

OrdFields ·

@@gpt-5 are any countries not bound by the UN DPRK sanctions regime?

OrdFields ·

**Short answer:** All UN member states are legally bound by the UN Security Council’s DPRK sanctions.

OrdFields ·

Details:
- Binding scope: DPRK sanctions are Chapter VII UNSC decisions. Under Article 25 of the UN Charter, they are binding on all 193 UN member states.
- Who isn’t strictly bound: Non‑member entities (e.g., states with limited recognition, certain observer states) aren’t legally bound by the UN Charter. However, most still align or face strong practical constraints because banks, exchanges, shippers, and trading partners in UN member states enforce the regime.
- Bottom line: For practical purposes, there’s no “safe” jurisdiction for sending funds to designated DPRK persons. Even where domestic law is silent, global intermediaries will block or report such transactions, and you can run afoul of other countries’ laws.

OrdFields ·

Humanitarian carve‑outs exist but require formal authorization and do not permit transfers to designated individuals.

palmbird ·

Is there a law against sending BSV to aliens ?

palmbird ·

Is there a law against sending BSV to aliens ?@@gpt-5

palmbird ·

It depends what you mean by “aliens.”

palmbird ·

- Extraterrestrials: There’s no law specifically about sending crypto to space aliens. Laws regulate your actions (e.g., sanctions compliance, AML/KYC, export controls), not the recipient’s species. So the usual rules still apply: don’t transact with sanctioned persons/entities or through prohibited channels, and follow your country’s crypto/FX laws.

palmbird ·

- “Aliens” as foreign nationals: Generally lawful to send crypto to people in other countries, but you must comply with:
- Sanctions: Do not transact with designated persons or comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions (e.g., DPRK, Iran, etc.). Violations can be criminal.
- AML/KYC and Travel Rule: Exchanges/vasps may block or report transfers to certain wallets or jurisdictions and require address whitelisting/verification.
- Local FX/crypto rules: Some countries restrict cross‑border crypto transfers or require reporting/permits.

palmbird ·

Bottom line: There’s no blanket ban on sending BSV to “aliens,” but all the usual legal constraints still apply. If you tell me your country, I can outline the specific rules and common pitfalls there. This isn’t legal advice—consult a qualified attorney for your situation.

palmbird ·

@@gpt-5 Belgium is my country.

palmbird ·

**Short answer (Belgium/EU):** You may send BSV to a foreign person so long as you comply with EU/Belgian rules and do not transact with sanctioned persons or prohibited destinations.

palmbird ·

What’s prohibited
- Sanctions: You must not send funds to designated persons/entities or comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions (e.g., DPRK, certain Russian-designated persons, terrorism lists, etc.). Your exchange will screen this and must block matches.
- Illicit channels: Transfers involving mixers/tumblers or high‑risk services can be blocked and investigated under AML rules.

palmbird ·

What’s required (EU/Belgium)
- Use a compliant provider: In Belgium, VASPs/CASPs operating locally must be registered with the FSMA; EU‑licensed providers also operate under MiCA/AML rules.
- Travel Rule (EU TFR): For transfers via exchanges/custodians, your provider must collect and transmit sender/recipient info. For self‑hosted wallets, they’ll collect your details and, for larger transfers (around €1,000+), may have to verify you control the wallet. Expect name, wallet/exchange details, and sometimes purpose-of-payment questions.
- AML/CTF checks: Be prepared for source‑of‑funds/wealth queries for larger or unusual transfers. Enhanced diligence applies for high‑risk countries (EU list).

palmbird ·

Practical checklist
1) Confirm the recipient is not sanctioned and that their wallet/exchange can receive BSV.
2) Use an EU‑registered exchange that supports BSV. Complete KYC and any address whitelisting.
3) If sending to a recipient’s exchange account, get their deposit memo/tag (if required) and the exact BSV network address.
4) If sending to a self‑custody wallet, your exchange may ask you to verify ownership for larger amounts; follow their procedure.
5) Keep records (transaction hashes, invoices/gift notes, communications). Banks and tax authorities may ask later.

palmbird ·

Taxes and reporting (high level, not legal advice)
- Personal transfers: Simply moving your own crypto isn’t taxed by itself. If it’s payment for goods/services or a gift, tax consequences can arise for you or the recipient depending on facts.
- Record‑keeping: Keep clear documentation of cost basis, dates, and purpose. Consult FOD Financiën or a Belgian tax advisor for your situation.

palmbird ·

If you share the scenario (amount, recipient country, whether it’s a gift or payment, and which exchange/wallet you use), I can outline a tailored, step‑by‑step plan to stay compliant.