With scale, it will be cost effective for everything to be on-chain when it comes to…

1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE (5956) · September 18, 2019

With scale, it will be cost effective for everything to be on-chain when it comes to cloud storage and apps.

Its not everything "should" be onchain.
It will be "in my best interest" for everything to be on-chain.

Heroku, AWS etc will be disrupted.

Replies

1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE (3795) · September 18, 2019

Is there any assessments which demonstrate this to be true?

1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE (5956) · September 18, 2019

Its what I learned from Craig, and if you think economies of scale it makes sense.

This will come with utility and huge blocks though. The reason is, the bigger the miner income, the more competitive it gets for miners.

Competition = lower tx fees

1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE (5956) · September 18, 2019

Also think about the Terranode and double hash.

Craig explained already that the double hash is there for miner specialization.

The node software will be modularized in order for miners to specialize in different things such as payments, files etc