1LqXTFUeJhmN9P266RJ6JsFQhnSxx2NGRo (6270) ·
LEGAL full disclosure rather than a "responsible disclosure". Both types of disclosure are legal, lawful and valid. Nobody is obliged to do "responsible disclosure" especially if they do not trust the person responsible. I been saying since day 1 he was
1LqXTFUeJhmN9P266RJ6JsFQhnSxx2NGRo (6270) ·
trying to cover this up. He's using weasel words trying to blame me, trying to call me a breacher, an attacker etc... when I have done no such thing. I told you all I was trying to see if I could inform the users and would go after Joel. I think Joel
1LqXTFUeJhmN9P266RJ6JsFQhnSxx2NGRo (6270) ·
thinks I am all bark and no bite. He tries to make it about me to deflect from his total incompetence. Now you're about to see proof of his lies, lying to everybody on Twitter - lying to everybody in his metanet circle-jerk. You have to be a special kind
1LqXTFUeJhmN9P266RJ6JsFQhnSxx2NGRo (6270) ·
of idiot to lie about things such as this when many are aware of what hash appened, and to act totally irresponsibly in still trying to cover things up. His "this is now criminal" threats I suggest are still attempts to intimidate me. I won't be
1LqXTFUeJhmN9P266RJ6JsFQhnSxx2NGRo (6270) ·
intimidated by a drawf - sword or no sword. So here I present you with some evidence that I've been factually correct all of this time, and he has been lying to his users. I know Joel and his character - maybe now you can all see why I decided on FULL
1LqXTFUeJhmN9P266RJ6JsFQhnSxx2NGRo (6270) ·
DISCLOSURE rather than "Responsible Disclosure" (i.e. sending him the info privately). He is a snake, he is trying to cover it all up to save himself and his circle-jerk business where HIS proof of work is practically zero, and it is Dr. Craig Wright doing