So, you’re not going to like this @Mungojelly, but my take,…

So, you’re not going to like this @Mungojelly, but my take, as an immune-compromised person (I take multiple immune suppressing meds for multiple autoimmune diseases) is that there is no way I would ever take this poisonous cocktail because I know of the harms its contents can potentially induce. The charged lipid nanoparticle itself is highly pathogenic via causing massive, cascading oxidative damage (as well as the fact that the body can’t break it down or excrete it) and the spike protein (that the body’s cells are instructed to make) is highly inflammatory, made in every organ and blood vessel and is potentially long-lasting, plus the potential for reverse transcription causing a never ending autoimmune response has been proven, in vitro at least. Simply put, the premise that the immune compromised would fare better with repeated heavy doses of synthetically produced spike protein and the LNP delivery mechanism into the cells, over transitory virus-induced spike protein that builds natural, robust immunity, was utterly false.
Then the premise that the vaccine would prevent transmission is also false. Then the premise that those getting the vaccine weren’t actually protected, so needed all others to take it, gave away the lie that anyone would benefit from it. Then the lack of evidence of efficacy, or long term safety data, legitimately should give people reason to pause and wait for more evidence. If 1 in 800 people get myocarditis from taking it, the risks are loaded onto the vaccine takers side, not the diminishingly small risks of encountering the virus naturally under the age of 80. Most people I know, whether vaccinated or not have had the virus multiple times. To think we can stop a cold virus from either sweeping through a population or mutating is pure hubris.