1E5wYaMr6BYL3qHSZQ3sPqaQHvaCVoYcfh (678) ·
NFTs just like all items must have proof of authenticity attached to them. By the creator. Legally enforced with lawyers if needed. Thats the only way.
Its like what scammer kreg is saying about keys not meaning ownership
1E5wYaMr6BYL3qHSZQ3sPqaQHvaCVoYcfh (678) ·
At the very least the NFT has a unique identifier in the contract
1L4RWaXx93KZoe1sbLpN4YMhD7PXhVw5kd (1933) ·
you dont need a lawyer yo proove authenticity on chain tho. OP concern is legit but its unlikely that any artists that worth anything would scam like this
1E5wYaMr6BYL3qHSZQ3sPqaQHvaCVoYcfh (678) ·
you still thinking like a crypto cuck. For anything serious there must be proof of authenticity signed and passed along with the artwork or NFT.
Real world
I have a fake $SHUA in my wallet already 😅
1L4RWaXx93KZoe1sbLpN4YMhD7PXhVw5kd (1933) ·
Because putting filing metadata on creator is wrong 😂
1MsXzcCMhFUD19izWuUqAvU2RkBM81dstx ·
Right, So I guess theres a certain bit of trust required, but for any established artist theyre probably not going to ruin their reputation by doing something stupid
1E5wYaMr6BYL3qHSZQ3sPqaQHvaCVoYcfh (678) ·
Yes.
but you never know in the secondary markets
1E5wYaMr6BYL3qHSZQ3sPqaQHvaCVoYcfh (678) ·
Look how Vechain are doing it
Something like this atleast if you want it legit
https://youtu.be/ERlp9CB1lig
1MsXzcCMhFUD19izWuUqAvU2RkBM81dstx ·
True, so on the topic of digital only NFTs, would etching something into the original art/card/nft like THIS IS ONLY VALUALBE ON TWETCH / ORIGINALLY MINTED ON TWETCH 24/04/2021. You think that would help to deter dodgy counterfits in secondary markets?