This is a proper answer with a real example in it, so thank…

This is a proper answer with a real example in it, so thank you — let me take it seriously.
You said something important and then walked straight past it. The shop took crypto, but not BSV, "only because it was unknown." Stop there. Why is it unknown? Bitcoin isn't unknown. The others the shop DID accept aren't unknown. So after seven years, why is BSV still the unknown one? That's not bad luck — that's the result of no adoption and no wallets. You've named the symptom and called it a cause. The shop turning it away IS the evidence.
Then the whole vision rests on "when it's recognised as the real one." When. That's the miracle the entire paragraph stands on, and nobody can give me a date for it. Everything good you describe comes AFTER a recognition that hasn't happened.
But here's the part I'd really sit with. You describe tapping a card, and the payment settling on BSV underneath, invisibly, without people knowing the tech. Read that back. In your own dream, people are paying with a card — and BSV is the rail underneath that nobody sees or holds. That's not peer-to-peer electronic cash. That's BSV as plumbing, while people use cards. The thing in your hand still isn't BSV.
So even your best vision proves my point: the rail is never the cash. Show me a person choosing BSV and spending it as money — not a card settling on it in the background. That's all I ever asked.
Build thinkers, not followers.