Both these options seem implausible to me. What else could …

3. Craig is not Satoshi?

This is possible, however in my view extremely unlikely at this point. I can't think of a single other person it could be.

CSW has demonstrated more knowledge about Bitcoin than everyone else put together.

How long are we going to let CSW string us along? What are we at now, like 4 or 5 years of being told, "Soon"? It's literally as asinine as "Lightning in 18 months" at this point.

"We"?

"Us"?

Make your own decisions. He's not stringing anyone along. Not sure what you're waiting for.

#BSV is ready to use right now for personal and business use.

How does demonstrating the most knowledge about bitcoin make one Satoshi?

Ian Grigg described satoshi as a team, this was the common understanding as late as 2017-2018 and only when the Ira case proceeded was the narrative formed that CSW was solely responsible.

🤷‍♂️

CSW being satoshi has a low dollar value imo

CSW being recognized as satoshi had immense value in 2015 when it was tried.

in 2015, CSW being satoshi would have kept consensus together imo.

in 2022 if csw is satoshi, whoop de fucking doo as BTC has long since completely won

Until it doesn't. "winning" is not finite, and I'm guessing you're referring to price.

BSV already won the protocol war and nothing comes close as a competitor.

The last sentence is loser script:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FY37Sj7MZTc

the system of determining value in the market is the best yardstick that has ever existed. its why capitalism works and socialism doesnt. it allows for the efficient distribution of resources and all of that.

Careful, the efficient market hypothesis only works when information is evenly distributed. It never is.

do you have a better system by which unknown participants can come together to determine the value of something?

>not stringing anyone along.

Meanwhile he is making posts like "be ready", "you don't know it, but you have been prepared for what comes".

Yeah, definitely not stringing anyone along.

If BSV wins, CSW being satoshi will just be a fun fact.

BSV is not immune from being commandeered by TPTB any more than was BTC.

The weaker its market position becomes, the more likely a coup will become the new reality.

I would appreciate everyone in this thread to plug their nose and offer a speculative value for BSV in the event the wider market recognizes 'CSW is satoshi'

My comment is in relation to calling BTC the winner based on price at this point in time.
Not on capitalism vs socialism.

I dont believe that a cheery narrative can change the reality of the situation.

A somber narrative much less so.

Really? Explain GameStop and Doge Coin.

I dont have to.

Markets exist as a distributed means to guide the allocation of resources.

GME and DOGE are volatile, but do you have a better means to determine their value than a marketplace of participants buying and selling it?

Value is subjective so you are correct. The market is the best method. That doesn’t meant the market always has the best information available.

fiduciary duty or whatever the legal term is for the responsibility of business that hold BTC implies that csw must announce such actions well in advance. Just recently he took back his claim to be willing to do so.

I have the best information on csw now.

What's "Soon" about?

So you think someone else would know more about Bitcoin than satoshi?

Read Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Mackay.

I think that knowing the most compared to others who are not Satoshi is not enough to prove that you are Satoshi.

would you believe that I was just notified of unused audible credits?

thank you sir.

How does one attempt to answer with words. It can be but only something like this, years in the making, where one can only sort of see a slice of it at a time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbjko3M0JT4

I like this. I see a lot of work. So much work. Must have taken a lot of people working to achieve the goal. But I sense I miss things in these.

Do I need to look again for what I’m missing I wonder?

We do not see with our eyes!

Confabulation.
1965 Rosen & Gregory
If a confabulating hospital patient is asked to recount the events of his day he may state with complete conviction that he has been in a distant city and describe his adventures there in detail.

https://www.amazon.com/Abnormal-Psychology-Gregory-I-Rosen/dp/B0000CMJ3Q

This happened to me. I was following what I thought was the right action based on what I was convinced I saw.
But did I make sure what I saw was correctly timestamped. Was it memory or a merely visualisation of what happened.
Take care with this work.

It is very relevant in this neck of the woods.

Thank you. I had seen so many connections. It had to be real.

Lesson learned hopefully.

Constantly guard against rash interpretation & action, especially dealing with the extra energy you need to direct as a result.

I am currently reading THE CHEMICAL BASIS OF MOKPHOGENESIS by A M Turing. Have you seen this or perhaps familiar with it?

No, I have not heard of that. Is it interesting?

I have bought the Abnormal psychology book you showed me.

Sorry it was a bad copy and paste from a PDF. The correct word should be Morphogenessis.
It is a difficult paper, way above my pay grade. I like the Alan Turning story, but it has a very sad ending.

An appalling way to be treated after the work done in service.

Is this something else that is common around this neck of the woods? Being treated poorly but especially poorly in relation to the work achieved.

Yes, but it is a long story, which for me began here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WarGames

Thanks for sharing. I will read the rest of it later. From what I read there, it would seem what you experienced was a little more serious than the way I was poorly rewarded. It still hurt though, just not as dangerous or serious.

You are doing just fine with your work.

Thanks. A little intense - due to lack of perspective & experience.

Really enjoyed the videos you posted for me. I might go & watch them again.

Is the use of my triple number referencing the beast causing a barrier to delivering something useful.

Such things are generally not helpful for people.

My thinking was that perhaps it could help take the horror away from the concept. Replace it with energy being trapped going forwards/backwards between those three numbers instead of flowing in a loop around all the numbers. That is how I visualise it.

Optimism, positive future, good luck and fun are better.

I think I understand. The concept could still be useful if not presented with an instant turn off.

Sometimes it seems so simple. All it takes is to make the opposite choice in a binary decision = circular good flow rather than the current linear flow.