OP_RETURN data is easy to prune.

Proof of work provides security, not hash power alone, correct?

It is an up front cost that encourages long term planning, in a competitive environment; which in turn rewards those who maintain rationality over those who become irrational ("symmetries").

How does hash power facilitate routing, aren't they separate?

I personally no longer believe that hash power actually provides security.

note : It would appear that Twitter has taken the XBT Periscope away from me (no worries).

I agree, but the company that's able to keep all of the OP_RETURN data becomes the next Google.

Ultimately security comes from symmetries and being an active learner of whatever it is you spend your time doing.

Hash power facilitates routing in the sense that you and I are both tuned into the the frequency of *this* chain and therefore we're able to communicate at *this* moment.

can you go deeper on the hash power usefulness?

Back in a bit. Going to try a few non-standard txs.

What you're calling PoW is actually just time-dilation and time.

It does facilitate message broadcasting and routing, but not really anything else that I consider to be useful.

Aight, let's talking about *this* in scope. B/c it is a problem that has to be solved in order to scale beyond me pushing it solo.

going to see if *these* [https://whatsonchain.com/tx/da738e29f64e90ae46dcc3e6b4154041d6324abbe7919e722d486a4a3148b7dc] txs will still work

UA I am still thinking the best option is to keep the BSV 1.1 fork alive and take advantage of the ABC difficulty adjustment algo... then I can just replay the un-marked/not-sweeped txs.

Nice. Excited to hear more about where you’re going to take it.

Xanatos Are you refering to time-dilation as in relativity theory? That is defined very specific with physics formulas...