1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE (271) ·
The Metanet runs on the Internet.
The Metanet has the potential to replace/augment the World Wide Web, NOT the Internet. Subtle, but important difference.
Replies
1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE (2782) ·
Thanks for stating this point. Makes a lot of sense to me now. I did not understand this point in full until I read your statement. Cheers!!! Good man. 🤜🤛
1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE (271) ·
I'm learning too, buddy.
CSW has stated though that OP_PD4 could fit inside an IPv6 packet so I might revise this statement in the future when/if people stop using IPv4.
Hope I didn't confuse too much!
1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE (2782) ·
Yes confused much!! So for now the Metanet is more designed to
co-exist on and with the internet whilst consuming its data and content to store and distribute via the network in a better way that can benefit all. Cont below. Need higher limits @Twetch
1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE (2782) ·
So this IPv4 / 6 OP_PD4 thing you speak of. Would this be a possible point of separation where the Metanet could then supersede and detach from the internet we know today to a far more advanced superior system and network?