@metamitya @AwesomeKalin55 On BTC, the hard fork already …

@metamitya @AwesomeKalin55

On BTC, the hard fork already happened, but they deny it ever took place—refusing to acknowledge the break from the original Bitcoin protocol. They keep using legacy addresses and calling themselves Bitcoin, but operate under different rules, capped block sizes, and disabled features.
On BSV, the hard fork has NOT happened. BSV stays true to the original Bitcoin protocol, design, and patent claims, preserving full original functionality including legacy addresses, full opcode support, and unbounded scaling.
Oh, and BSV legacy wallet addresses also work on BTC. I was able to recover “lost” BTC funds using BSV infrastructure, demonstrating full backwards compatibility between BSV and BTC at the legacy address level.
So which one is the original?
In short: BTC is the hard fork, but denies it. BSV is the continuation of the original Bitcoin vision and protocol.