Looking for some raw thoughts about today? I talk about th…

Great job man, keep it up!

$xxvtplaya4xx

Yep we don't need to be acting like altcoiners.
tlt@relayx.io
sheepnomore@moneybutton.com

I would like to see more unique ways to invest in the ecosystem. I think tokens might be able to open that up. Although it might be like illegal shares in a company? I won't ever be a programmer and I'm very busy with my day job but I can invest.

Tokens are a great option. Also consider investing in startups in the space.

The law stuff will improve things going fwd just as law & regs to the 90's internet made it safer & more workable for today.
But ffs CSW, don't make grand proclamations & then announce the complete opposite a year later. Set in stone your words & actions.

100% right and very well put (but BSV skyrocketing like BTC or some other shit coin would be awesome too haha)

I think you're just knee-jerk jumping to apologize for Craig's grandstanding.

He knows the 'private slack' group messages are being posted, and he's obviously directing his comments to the general public.

People get tired of gas-lighting. Bags or no.

A great 5-minute BSV crash course for a newbie like me!

thedudeabides@moneybutton.com

Wait, are you saying that stealing the key to a house makes you the owner of the house? Car would probably be a better analogy since you could actually take it and drive it away. Isn’t that the essence of what is being contested in court by CSW now?

You are always a warrior for sanity and reason

For years now, I’ve been telling people to ignore Craig and build something valuable. People keep getting sucked back in to listening to Craig ranting. I like Craig, but he’s not our business partner, and people need to realize that.

And you are simply dismissing the fact that Craig's actions & commentary have huge impact on the viability of businesses & investment into the BSV society

Sure lets invite people to be doxxed, attacked & cancelled for the crime of considering Craig's Coin

Hi Kurt, great article, but do we have a number of how many bitcoins were robbed through extortion from crypto viruses? Is it realistic to think that all of these coins will be given back to their rightful owners ? think of all the hacks over the years.
https://twetch.app/t/b568080f08c4c715610036daf8af686478285a99b44ebfa4cd807638d9d8ddab

The high-school click-y state right now is due to the fact that no coin other than BSV (and BCH, to an extent) is viable. They are get-rich-quick marketing.

If people continue to build what's impossible on other coins, the twitter drama becomes irrelevant

Hey, its Craig Wright bringing the 'high school'; calling out the criminals and Ponzi boys in BTC while desperately clinging to his own stash like a compulsive gambler.

Drama is not on twitter, that's just words, drama is on the market.

Words alter perception which impact collective consciousness.

Who wants to invest in a community that feels sorry for themselves? Or even worse, a project who’s success relies solely on the actions of one man? Very few.

Heavily recirculated coins can’t be returned, imo.

We have to be talking of millions of coins that have been used to make purchases of goods, traded for cash etc. Why don't we know about which coins he was talking about? If I was robbed, I need to show proof of what was stolen to be possibly refunded.

He did sent out letters telling them to freeze them in the meantime a while back, didn't he? Probably not circulated a lot. But idk

He did.

He is talking about coins which have not been moved. Keys were stolen.

Since they were stolen early 2020, thats probably shortly after and if you freeze the stolen coins right away, they hopefully have not circulated that much. That probably looks different with the mount gox coins that the gov sold already though.. (not his)

which makes me think there's small but real possibility he didn't loose the keys or ALL the keys req'd to move coins, doing it to set precedent. Yet, we don't know, and he may in fact have been insufficient in his security. Regardlesss, it'll be precedent

If he is talking about coins that have not moved, we have to assume a few things. 1) He can prove someone else got a hold of the private keys AND they were removed from his network AND he did not have any backup. 2) He has a way to prove he owns the coins.