I have this lingering suspicion that the Party isn't trying…
I have this lingering suspicion that the Party isn't trying to make Harris president. It feels to me like the goal isn't winning, but making it seem like a close race ending in a narrow victory for the Donald. And then the country will be punished in a variety of ways, similar to how the English are being punished for Brexit. If I controlled the entire state apparatus, its institutions and the media, I'd want to be in the opposition, not in the White House.
Replies
dont think so. too much power at stake
In order to make the UN go from communist shadow worldgovernment to communist world government, the US must go through terrible events and the population disarmed in the process. I'd put Trump in the WH and let him be in charge when it all starts getting really bad. Maybe we aren't there yet, but I'm gue
Guessing we aren't very far away. One thing is for sure: the US as it is can not be brought under a world government.
I got one marker I use to see how far behind the agenda is: I knew since the 90's or early 2000's that cash was scheduled to be gone by 2025. That was in official documents back then. It's very unlikely to be on time, but you can see how much is being done to get there.
I don't know what the time-frame for an official world government is, but I'm guessing between 2030 and 2050. It seems that the speed of the agenda depends on how many deep events there are. With a major pandemic, war or natural disaster things can speed up significantly.