17zmPibuXUuDsPnW5B4UVsV9jin35HWWU2 (1832) ·
Initial impression: Twetch looks sharp. I want to see where this goes.
It's not bad for a project that - if I understand correctly - game theory predicts cannot exist.
Y'all don't realize it yet, but this whole thing is theoretically impossible!
Replies
1AE48vXR3aXUzEtmhRDVomrymGvETqF1NS (2275) ·
nick szabo wrote a paper on it
micropayments are impossible, and will never work
there was a whole psychology study on it ffs!
19C3V2TFr43KZb6c9wJT9V3Ayz9gZpJVek (8952) ·
Really? Szabo wrote a paper against it?
16SySw44S661H8ztfenUy3LMitRnUF2awL (950) ·
Nick Szabo also said BitCoin wasn't Turing complete.
1AE48vXR3aXUzEtmhRDVomrymGvETqF1NS (2275) ·
https://nakamotoinstitute.org/static/docs/micropayments-and-mental-transaction-costs.pdf
1Nk1B6dbxxDSZYdFdWZncmtX7APquLfP8B (678) ·
Welcome, Steve
1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C (622) ·
That's good, because I heard that Twetch doesn't exist.
That's still a thing, right?
14NGBZemzKksQNQS6qVqTzH5NcYFGFi5Lq (2151) ·
Ok Steve. I’ll give you a follow.....for now.
1MLa4N2xA8bKPPQhGMss3zG53cNdHFsvr9 (1555) ·
Twetch is not real because it is possible to make a psychology-jargon equivalent of an `Optical illusion`?
14SKpQAe7XkZsoSwVGg7TfuEWkgH5vAp6D (18222) ·
psychology-jargon equivalent of an `Optical illusion` = cognitive dissonance