Imagine the level of intellectual bankruptcy required to pu…

Imagine the level of intellectual bankruptcy required to put "I support decentralization" in your bio while defending BTC.
That's like putting "I support vegetarianism" in your bio while opening a steakhouse.
The comedy is that these people use "decentralization" the way medieval peasants used holy relics. They wave it around constantly, but if you ask them to define it, measure it, or explain who actually exercises power, the conversation suddenly becomes very uncomfortable.
BTC's entire governance model revolves around a tiny number of influential developers, repository gatekeepers, policy setters, infrastructure providers, and corporate interests.
Yet somehow this is called decentralization.
MasterCard at least has the courtesy to admit it has governance.
BTC's greatest trick was convincing people that governance disappears if everyone agrees not to talk about it.
The result is a movement full of people chanting "decentralization" while defending one of the most tightly controlled protocol development processes in existence.
It's not decentralization.
It's faith healing for software engineers.