Imagine leading a group of people who riot and acting like โฆ
Imagine leading a group of people who riot and acting like you have no responsibility ๐๐ WTF?
Replies
George Soros ;)
Just an innocent AshkeNAZI. ๐คฆ๐ป
Imagine burning cities to the ground and thinking thats okay ๐ .....but taking it to dc isnt?
Hopefully thats not what you think I am saying. I enjoyed the capital scene... just not sure why people are surprised theres some serious repercussions. The capital is not wendys.
On the other hand:
Imagine being held accountable for the individual actions of other grownups.
Here's an extreme example:
Was Manson responsible for the deeds of some crazy (chrch of satan educated) peope he hung out with?
I don't think so
This being said, FINANCING violence obviosly makes the one paying partly responsible.
Ali was not arrested. MB just doesnt want to be the bank of insurrection IMO. @wren also mentioned manson to me.
Providing the financial services? MB
Providing financial services to someone who was (allegedly) involved in violence isn't the same as financing violence, though.
Did he allegedly organize the violent people or is it fact? ๐ He organized them using BSV lol ๐
Did he pay people to be violent?
Do you think the federal reserve is responsible for every crime comitted using dollars?
Imagine you organized a party and someone gets violent.
That isn't the responsibility of the organizer, is it?
youre asking if i think he committed a crime... no. Youre changing the entire conversation and argument lol the point is does MB have reason to not want to be involved with him? IMO yes.
That's fine with me.
They make choices.
Choices have consequences.
I did not say he should be charged with a crime ๐ I am saying theres reason MB wants distance. But if you dont want to admit that i dont care lol
Absolutely lol I hate MB im not choosing sides like everyone else seems to be
We agree then.
MB (or BSV) certainly can't be held accountable for what coins are used for, but they can distance themselves from customers for their own reasons and risk backlash.
Quite honestly I have no idea why we dont all agree on this lol I am highly misunderstood I guess. MB is just trying to do the right thing and not be involved like "hey ali cool man but go do it over there without us!"
Why is there a difference. If anyone on the right tried to bail any of these people out they would be considered helping terrorists. But when dems and actors do it its fine....lets actually have fund raisers to get these criminals out...that great ๐
One is on federal government ground for one... they dont own wendys. No one cares about wendys. The court of public opinion could very well have sacrificed MB on the alter of false blame. Theyre just afraid and distancing. Just my opinion.
I dont have a side. I see no difference in what republicans and democrats are doing...both are fucked up....but one shouldnt be excused bc the media is on their side. Those were federal buildings being tore up...police being attacked....cities ruined. ๐ฏ
I agree... and their leaders bear some responsibility (maybe not with law but in business setting). I think government is slavery both sides.
Dems want to start a war... then point fingers at everyone else. U cant go to school/work/church but u can go burn down ur city and beat ppl to death bc thats helping the narrative! Wake the fuck up people...your all being fed bullshit and ur eating it up!
Dems hate for trump has tore this country apart. Now its going to be illegal to be a conservative...everybody must think the same....follow in line...get fuxked!
Agree its easy to see.
Think of a sports team organising an event then the fans rioting, does the sports team get deplatformed everywhere due to the public behaviour?
Its up to each free individual company no? I dont know man lol