12xBipc1isTHEjEQLQUYqcf4eh8pSj3vLL (24596) ·
Thoughts on a bsv transaction youtube?
19nTUyw97xhqL7eVJzmAJT2RbTvbW84gwv (561) ·
do you mean a youtube competitor based on bsv?
streamanity.com is quite nice already (they host the content and use bsv for pay-per-minute)
hosting high quality videos on bsv is too expensive for most vids. That's where things like IPFS could make sense
15jx1bP54GxstAZG8oZkgYeFRHgGaxt6tm (190) ·
Streamanity has fine interface and UX, but nobody is on it. Vids posted there get almost no views. There's very little good content there.
Need some kind of better onboarding & incentive to use. As a consumer and producer of vids, I get more via YouTube
17wiCRZuJ9GWumnjr1shRfLVzRHd5BzDiR (8015) ·
You already know the solution 😉
https://twetch.app/t/1e33ca6a2c093879aa67fce338b562e4ecff5fb2f97824cd931f48490abb53f9
19nTUyw97xhqL7eVJzmAJT2RbTvbW84gwv (561) ·
exactly, that's why Brave's strategy is so smart.
You can pay on youtube & get paid on youtube, no need to move to another platform yet.
BSV should copy that for now instead of trying to rebuild from scratch.
17wiCRZuJ9GWumnjr1shRfLVzRHd5BzDiR (8015) ·
I would argue that there's plenty of need but the friction is too high. Convincing smaller pools of creators is tougher than moving already primed niche communities a-la Twetch.
Even Noah had to build the Ark before his people could inherit the New World.
19nTUyw97xhqL7eVJzmAJT2RbTvbW84gwv (561) ·
Their big mistake is not allowing 100% free content if uploader wants to, and they need much finer options for deciding which part is paywalled.
And as you say they need an onboarding startegy for users, much too complicated to use for non-bitcoin people
1DYThJa9xCeuCKcwvZ91h4DdJGevs9gK7L (2566) ·
That's what needs to happen. Many great apps but view numbers not encouraging. Let's hope many wake up and see these great products.