1PKvGfnbofHU7srBqnBnea1tiZBGuYgoiD (12203) ·
So the poll creator needs to determine how many votes there can be beforehand cause how would the set amount pollfunds get distributed as you go without that?
1PKvGfnbofHU7srBqnBnea1tiZBGuYgoiD (12203) ·
set amount of poll funds*
1J2YHSZqt58AcHsGug4RsqQD2FtqzbBUzo (3795) ·
Maybe a maximum number of voters, but bitcoin is hugely divisible
Imagine a company that wanted to get some feedback/market research and valued it at £50/£100. 10,000 participants get half a penny/a penny each. But more people then it just divides further
1J2YHSZqt58AcHsGug4RsqQD2FtqzbBUzo (3795) ·
Today, company would probably do a poll and give one lucky winner that £50/£100.
Well that model exists because they have no option of a micropayment economy.
1PKvGfnbofHU7srBqnBnea1tiZBGuYgoiD (12203) ·
Yeah but what was i getting at is that how would the funds get distributed evenly without setting a maximum number of voters?
1J2YHSZqt58AcHsGug4RsqQD2FtqzbBUzo (3795) ·
Another option is to set an amount per person, say 0.5 cent. then you set a maximum amount you are willing to give out, for example £2. Then the number of voters is limited to 400 voters in that example.
No complex divisions that way.
1PKvGfnbofHU7srBqnBnea1tiZBGuYgoiD (12203) ·
Yeah, setting the amount per person is just another way of setting the maximum number of votes beforehand. An alternative would be to set a time frame for the poll to be active or stopping the poll whenever you like.