🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻 https://twetch.app/t/2e21a573b07d02819eebe8529eb98cf5f7…

If you are of the Aristotle school of thought deciding right from wrong is the golden mean between two vices. This is why I say you need nuance. Or is right from wrong, do unto others what would be done unto you? These are complex questions.

Its really simple not complicated. Government for example does wrong across the globe on a daily basis while they sell you policy goals of nonsense. They harm innocent people for power and profit while you cheer about windmills.

If I like pain can I inflict pain? Of course not. Cmon man. Its simple. You are a sovereign being that I should respect. You of course respect no one so I will treat you like a turd.

If you like pain, you can inflict pain, if you're Dominatrix. There are masochists who will pay you to inflict pain upon them, so I literally don't understand your rationale.

Your view of government being evil isn't unfounded, I don't disagree. I disagree insofar that policy goals are nonsense. I give you substance and you give me shit on a plate and called it policy substance ie "The Culture War," or "Civics in Education"

Do you not understand consent?

Do you think youre teaching me something?

Masochists literally consent to have pain inflicted upon them.
I've dated several women who were into getting slapped during sex.
I just found a loophole in your claim, "if I like pain can I inflict pain?" and the answer is yes, if both parties consent.

No, I'm just poking holes in your flawed logic. You said, "If I like pain can I inflict pain?" You said no.
I said yes assuming you were a Dominatrix where your job is to literally inflict pain on willing subjects.

We need a whole lot less policy imo and more liberty. Lumping different discussions into one sentence and calling it shit shows your lack of respect. No one likes any of you lemmings because of this.

Your example involves consent moron mine does not. But its the same to you isnt it?

if what?

Well, if you're talking politics you better come prepared with actual policy.
Literally the only thing politics is about is POLI-cy that's why it's called POLI-tics.
That's why I called you an unserious hack, because you're not interested in POLICY.

And that goes to my next point. Name me a policy proposal that is focused on providing "more liberty" because wtf does that even mean? You're not saying anything.
"I propose a policy of more liberty!"
Like okay? Wtf does that even mean?

You called me a hack because youre a child with no respect. And youve earned my disrespect because of it. You dont know my policies because I haven't told you them. I dont need to either. Government policy is generally not in our best interest. Youll see.

We just voted for a new liberty in AZ. Youre a disrespectful child.

Many policies promote liberty. The fact that you don't understand the meaning of such policies is frightening.

If both parties consent. There's also the other adage of you can literally inflict pain on anyone if you enjoy it, but the consequences would be jail time.
Or you become a boxer where you can beat the shit out of people for fun.
There are loopholes.

Ok so that would follow natural law. Can you understand that if one party DOES NOT CONSENT then youre doing wrong? Its morally wrong? Or do you not understand and think its your right? Did you not understand my original point did NOT include consent?

I think your main goal is to disagree since you acted like I was talking about doms lol are you that slow? Do you really think im talking about some dominatrix scenario kid?

/trolltoll @42069 $10

Okay, then literally name me the policy proposal you state promotes liberty.
What is the name of policy?

NO 😂

You haven't told me your policies because you literally don't have any. The one you mentioned was "Civics in Education" which literally doesn't mean anything when Civics and Social Studies are already taught in school.

What does that mean?
What was the policy that you say you voted for a new liberty?
We're finally getting somewhere. Tell me more about this new liberty. What was the policy?

I understand it, still doesn't stop natural law from being based in theological reasoning. And my view is anything theologically based usually lacks critical thinking.
If I'm at war and I kill a terrorist I didn't have the terrorist's consent to kill him.