I haven't read any recent Searle. His most recent book I re…

I haven't read any recent Searle. His most recent book I read was The Rediscovery of the Mind (1992). I found it compelling. I remember him saying that we needed different concepts (not yet invented) to describe the mind, and that if we only described/measured it in physical terms, the interesting stuff, the thoughts, memories, the phenomenology, etc, were all missing. Do you think that's still true today--with Neural lace and other forms of thought mapping advancement--can we now say the mind is a physical entity?