1Dacry5uNvQXNdw8ojuVRERzwzbx5h1Tj7 (2275) ·
inb4 algo to decide who gets more visibility on their branches
13ePwhRdgmMfUbPF2K9AWf8czxiAmpkYMh (4721) ·
Oh and we’ll build in shadow banning while we’re at it!
1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C (622) ·
Agreed.
I think there's an imbalance between cost and benefit of branching vs cost and benefit of responding directly to the post.
Readjusting that, even slightly, may be sufficient to solve the problem, and may encourage more involvement with posts.
12eUXcqAmQc41yB975exJgtCkeq4L3RUDc (5411) ·
Might as well just rebrand as twitter.
19nTUyw97xhqL7eVJzmAJT2RbTvbW84gwv (561) ·
totally agree, if they are smart Twetch could create a market for "plugins" in twetch in the form of different sorting or feed ranking algorithms.
People would pay to use the one that best fits them.
https://twetch.app/t/dc794b785f0ffab9c6a31aa4448da4420a040341ec2134444aafcaf10570cd9b
1ArWwG1oLuQtvzUubnjBHgmRr3iz2cwApJ (501) ·
Data is on chain, anyone can create a different app to display top posts and followers posts in a way that makes sense. If there is enough demand it might even earn money for that.
16SgJCRH7fB5ny6wCHabmiGaa6wcbve6WS (21877) ·
I'd pay for that!
1J6h7Bex83EVCGvamT5LMVm9MECX4bSquW (7355) ·
How much?
Asking for a friend 😎
16SgJCRH7fB5ny6wCHabmiGaa6wcbve6WS (21877) ·
I'd be willing to pay a one time fee comparable to the other one time fees for features in the range of $1 to $5 like the existing pricing for dark more, etc... Maybe more if the features were really helpful