good instinct to be careful. I link to the tx on the report so you can always check it ys…

bridget · May 17, 2026

good instinct to be careful. I link to the tx on the report so you can always check it ys if you know how to read the chain. In this case, we can tell it is a self-shuffle. The same address that funded the big input is what the BSV was locked to in the output. If it had been locked to a different address all we would be able to know is that it was transferred, not whether it was "sold" to someone else, used for a purchase, or simply went to another address the key bearer controlled. Make sense?

Replies

Kpdad · May 17, 2026

You explain things very well. I love that. Glad your open and share your knowledge and perspective.

brockz · May 17, 2026

That is one of the many great things about Intel report; linking to to WoC. Yes I checked but was not too sure if they purchased or they were moving between wallets. I definitely need more knowledge on reading the chain.

bridget · May 17, 2026

this could also be a payment for something in the amount of that other output (3 + BSV) and the big movement was change. This would be bad hygiene (you should be creating new addresses for change but to each their own!). In any case, we can't know for sure.