1Mg2Zb2VbidHmJh9ZEXLaYKGndVEierdWt (1752) ·
Freedom of association and property rights are all that matter, everything else flows from there.
Soon moochers and looters won’t have any claim over what isn’t there’s. Physical and digital walls of security will be impervious to their puny attacks.
Replies
1Mg2Zb2VbidHmJh9ZEXLaYKGndVEierdWt (1752) ·
@109 this was in response to your recent post. That weirdo you’re arguing with has a trolltoll on me.
1Jvg1Ggqo564iuyaLE1RqEdGetwqzNCC1L (116) ·
Wanabe dictator would be cannon fodder in the world he's talking about.
And yes, we're going to make these people irrelevant *forever.*
1Mg2Zb2VbidHmJh9ZEXLaYKGndVEierdWt (1752) ·
All communists believe they would be Stalin after the Bolsheviks win.
Never realizing they’ll be the first ones to have their hearts skewered on the sword of their new master. Nobody likes a midwit, especially not dictators. They need dummies.
18xEUFHkRNdJWiDSPURAJVV5A3iuw4e1Rk (21877) ·
You guys really love political extremism. All he said was that there has to be some basic sense of cultural limitations and you're calling him Stalin. I beseech you, good sir, take a breath and have a little perspective.
1Mg2Zb2VbidHmJh9ZEXLaYKGndVEierdWt (1752) ·
No.
18xEUFHkRNdJWiDSPURAJVV5A3iuw4e1Rk (21877) ·
Claiming society should have *some* kind of cultural limits rather than exact anarcho capitalism does not make you a wanna be dictator. That's just being childish.
1Mg2Zb2VbidHmJh9ZEXLaYKGndVEierdWt (1752) ·
/trolltoll @11018 $0.218
18xEUFHkRNdJWiDSPURAJVV5A3iuw4e1Rk (21877) ·
Oh sure, and I enjoy the discussion, but to claim that anyone who does not agree 100% with Anarchocapitalism has inherent sick desires to be Stalin is about as unreasonable as lefty loons claiming everyone is white supremacist. It's flatly preposterous.
1Jvg1Ggqo564iuyaLE1RqEdGetwqzNCC1L (116) ·
"Imposed top down."
1Mg2Zb2VbidHmJh9ZEXLaYKGndVEierdWt (1752) ·
Keep on fence sitting. I’m sure you can get someone to help you take the splinters out of your ….
18xEUFHkRNdJWiDSPURAJVV5A3iuw4e1Rk (21877) ·
Is that comment directed at me? I would not describe engaging people politely when discussing liberatianism as fence sitting.
18xEUFHkRNdJWiDSPURAJVV5A3iuw4e1Rk (21877) ·
Some limits imposed from the top down. In other words, some laws.
1Mg2Zb2VbidHmJh9ZEXLaYKGndVEierdWt (1752) ·
You can’t sit on the fence forever.
There are those who want to be free and those who don’t. Choose or “they” will choose for you.
18xEUFHkRNdJWiDSPURAJVV5A3iuw4e1Rk (21877) ·
Do you honestly not understand what I am saying? That this type of thinking just keeps the group of people advocating for freedom tribalist, unrealistic, closed minded, insular and deluded. If someone is skeptical, be reasonable.
18xEUFHkRNdJWiDSPURAJVV5A3iuw4e1Rk (21877) ·
While we are at it, I think one could replace property rights with contract sanctity in your original formulation of where freedom flows from. Is it fruitful to ever have discussions? Does freedom ever really flow from closed mindedness and tribalism?
1HsARx3TiY2iYHWoyu4XF88fZq9rih32gH (116) ·
Discussion suggests it’s up for debate. It’s just not.
18xEUFHkRNdJWiDSPURAJVV5A3iuw4e1Rk (21877) ·
Ok. I love you guys, I understand where your passion comes from. I'm just very disappointed, as I really had hopes that people would be encouraged to have discussions rather than become simple minded ideologues like on twitter.
1Mg2Zb2VbidHmJh9ZEXLaYKGndVEierdWt (1752) ·
No.
I don’t debate my manumission with anyone.
18xEUFHkRNdJWiDSPURAJVV5A3iuw4e1Rk (21877) ·
No seriously, why are you objecting to any meaningful discussion in any way? Ought people to count IP? Which types of IP? How does tech help with that? When you say the word "manumission" do you mean the freedom to bear arms?
15Xi18Yjqr1HhUntEXmjSjB6ETStK2Mx3o (60) ·
As Craig says, I don't think you can rely on just code to protect you; you need law. But recent events show even law is vulnerable to capture if the culture's going downhill. Physical walls can protect, of course, but depends on from whom/how etc.
1156ihk6SYiSsoBcNPMKMw3RuaF3hgc5Zf (2089) ·
A government-enforced monopoly on ideas for whoever pays their ransom, irrespective of who the original inventor was, punishing any implicitly similar original thought as explicit theft, violating the ideas of owning your own work and copyright? … idea.
1PfnfuYXc7PJgN1wfh79BFeowsVYseoTGg (8383) ·
“The revolution is a dirty …” The Marxist heads will kill all the “doers” & “heroes” of the Struggle. history will be re written & can’t have dirty secrets keepers around. if you betrayed once you will again, all heroes disappear just read about Stalin