Nicotine destroys NanoTech!!?? Really how? Oh no, look.. NA…

Nicotine destroys NanoTech!!?? Really how?
Oh no, look.. NANOBOTS!!

Has anyone noticed how misused the word "nanobot" is now?

Anyone doing some microscopy sees something small and round and says "NANOBOT!!!" 🤖

Terminology is supposed to carry weight and meaning.

A bot implies a machine that can move itself and perform programmed functions.

❓Why can't we just look at some toxic nano assemblies/constructs and say "hey, that's pretty bad"

There's no need to sensationalize reality, it's already bad enough 😂

If you ever see an actual nanobot, you will know it.

Unless now we're defining any programmed nano as a robot? So now nano drug carriers and delivery systems are nanobots too?
Or what about materials that self-assemble? I guess kitchen magnets are now bots too 🤔😂

In that case your colloidal nanogold, fulvic acid, EDTA, C60 and Zeolite are all nanobots.
(wew this post is definitely going to ruffle some feathers )

To maintain intellectual integrity I personally refer to the Bluetooth interfaces injected into people "nanomachines"

Bots move around programmatically. Machines perform programmed tasks stationary.

If you want to go viral, say whatever sounds good.
If you want to have integrity, choose your words carefully.
https://independz.podbean.com/e/the-nicotine-naivety/