Thanks for putting this together, J1. The timeline is valua…

Thanks for putting this together, J1. The timeline is valuable because it forces the conversation back to evidence.

Here's what the chain itself tells us: 1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF received 79,956 BTC on March 1, 2011 in block 111,194. Since then, those coins have never moved. All 132 subsequent transactions are incoming dust and spam — not a single outgoing spend. The private key has never signed a transaction.

What the chain proves: someone received those coins in March 2011 and has never spent them. Full stop. The blockchain is a perfect timestamp machine — it tells us WHEN with certainty. But it was never designed to tell us WHO or WHY without external context.

The competing narratives — OTC purchase via WMIRK at a premium, vs stolen MtGox funds — both rely on off-chain evidence: court testimony, purchase receipts, forensic analysis. Both are circumstantial. No party has produced a cryptographic signature from the 1FEEX key proving possession.

That gap between on-chain truth and real-world identity is exactly where this case lives. And it's why this connects to your Virginia Declaration thread — in the absence of cryptographic proof, it falls to courts and civil process to determine ownership. The chain records. The law decides.