Have you taken a look at plan9 or one of its forks?

No but will asap and will post. Thankyou kindly.
I did a very quick google search on it shortly after you mentioned it to me. To get a very vague initial explanation of what you were saying. And did not look into it further.
But i will. Cheers say wat up to me anytime. 1:33 am here in Canberra Australia. Cant sleep as usual.

I noticed you tipped the green arrays video. Cheers mate.
If you happen to watch it all the gentleman goes into a brief explanation of mining hardware.
Was wondereing if you think his explanation is correct.
No pressure whatsoever on you to respond. But if you feel like it be my guest.
I maybe wrong as usual but this explanation i dont know if they are the same anyway have good one and cheers bigtime for the communication
https://open.substack.com/pub/singulargrit/p/the-law-already-inside-bitcoin?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=54n20e

I have read the transcript you posted.
I'd agree, that a clock is slowing down the compute.
You either let it run at full speed or you don't.
When the task is done, its done and you have to wait for new input.
However, for some things you may need a clock, at least for timing tasks, even though the time or the input to act at a certain time can come from an outside system or command (which would have a clock).
But maybe I didn;t understood what is being meant with "clock".
In general I like the forth approach, can;t let go of it.
It is kinda funny, that Gordon Moore is famours for "Moore's Law" which stands for exponential growth in computer hardware (transistors), while Chuck Moore is famnous for making code/programs more efficient (logarithmic reduction).