I noticed you tipped the green arrays video. Cheers mate. I…
I noticed you tipped the green arrays video. Cheers mate.
If you happen to watch it all the gentleman goes into a brief explanation of mining hardware.
Was wondereing if you think his explanation is correct.
No pressure whatsoever on you to respond. But if you feel like it be my guest.
I maybe wrong as usual but this explanation i dont know if they are the same anyway have good one and cheers bigtime for the communication
https://open.substack.com/pub/singulargrit/p/the-law-already-inside-bitcoin?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=54n20e
Replies
Yes, I have read the transcript.
I would agree, that without a clock, the compute would run at full speed and would just end, when the task has finished, waiting for new input.
However I do not know much about the clocks and their purpose in computers.
But I like the forth-approach very much.
Kinda funny, that one Moore is responsible for the law of exponential growth, whereas another Moore is responsible for making code/programs more efficient.
When they merge you can have very efficient systems.
With regards to CSW's article:
I'd agree, that you can't mine anonymouse, that you will have law, and that miners will be held accountable.
Not sure how he meant the part about "protocol only security" for small transactions though. Depending on whether you have identity or not, even small transactions can be secured by law.