It is evident that the Metanet client, the BSV browser, or …

It is evident that the Metanet client, the BSV browser, or apps featuring BRC-100 wallets are technologically more advanced than platforms such as @treechat, @3dordi , or metanet.page. However, there is a fundamental business principle: being either too early or too late in adopting a technology often leads a venture to failure. For instance, eight years ago, I made a substantial investment to tokenize Colombian emeralds on the Ethereum blockchain; it resulted in a total financial loss for me. While it left me with valuable experience and knowledge, it failed to achieve adoption—people simply did not understand it at the time. Similarly, I believe that Project Babbage’s products are at least five or eight years ahead of their time. In contrast, products like Treechat’s chat service or 3DOrdi’s NFT marketplace—which offer social interaction, engagement, and direct payments using satoshis—are much easier to grasp for anyone who has ever owned a cryptocurrency wallet or an NFT. I contend that the timing is now perfect for digital natives with some blockchain experience to flock to BSV en masse, given its scalability and high capacity. Later on—once people come to understand the risks associated with reusing the same Bitcoin address multiple times—they will gradually migrate toward products featuring BRC-100 wallets, and we ( @metamitya) will have to adapt on the fly.
https://youtu.be/g3evxT0NHdQ?si=oZtiwNRE1cZXLOkz