Twetch ·
I don't want to invest in companies anymore, I want to invest in persons directly.
Any idea how to do so?
How can I directly invest in and profit from @24 or @4 ?
Show me the future
Replies
Twetch ·
it would be better to build a competitive business yourself
Twetch ·
Cannot and don't even want to compete with you guys in these fields.
I do other things but want to profit from you
Show me how
Twetch ·
First tattoo our names on your arm.
Twetch ·
negotiable
Twetch ·
I'm going to tokenize myself on the blockchain and you can buy some of my IPO = "initial person offering"
Twetch ·
Yeah our businesses will help your business work better.
Twetch ·
Exactly
Companies are like a fked up middle man for what I really want to invest in
Twetch ·
That's slavery so NO it's NOT a good idea!!! If you want to invest in people you can give them a job, which I don't need, sorry. If you invest in bitcoins you're invested in all bitcoiners without being specific about it.
Twetch ·
@255 would love your opinion here
Twetch ·
5/18/20
Twetch ·
For real nobody's going to tell you how to profit because if they knew how they'd do it themselves!!!! Sorry you have to figure out how to profit on your own.
Twetch ·
No, the same argument of yours would go for investing in companies.
Twetch ·
Yeah, it does! If you invest in companies, you have to figure out which ones are going to be profitable.
Twetch ·
Companies = persons, just formed as a legal entity, which I see as a useless middle man for me as an investors
Show me the future of investing, dont be afraid to have money thrown at you directly
YOU are the companie in the end
Twetch ·
You start
Twetch ·
Tell me how much
Then tell me how much % I get from your Bitcoin income for how long (all negotiable)
Ensure me via a technical Bitcoin solution that I cannot get easily scammed, so I can kinda audit myself or whatever (should be doable)
Its not stupid
Twetch ·
No I'm saying this is YOUR idea so YOU start by selling investment in yourself along the lines you described.
Twetch ·
Thats true! Same goes for me after all.
But I want to diversify, and I myself cannot and have no interest to serve competitive in the fields you can.
Twetch ·
this is just "normal" investing after all, just into persons not companies
and Bitcoin could make it way easier
Just brainstorming, I asked the question first now you throw it back to me
Twetch ·
Slavery is not negotiable, so that is not what I am talking about.
I want to throw money at persons, not companies, and get a share of the persons income
Nobody is forced to do so, so no slavery at all
You are right about "investing in" Bitcoin though
Twetch ·
Furthermore:
I earn money by things that I cannot easily scale by getting more money thrown at me
But others can scale their work by getting money easier
Imagine musicians who just need money for music vids. I dont want to invest in music labels though
Twetch ·
Worth looking into the history of corporations and how they helped society develop tremendously. It's not just a middleman. It's very very important.
Twetch ·
Human beings are naturally collaborative and cooperative in many endeavors in life. While we do compete with each other, and this is healthy, we also can recognize that many large tasks can only be accomplished by combining our efforts for something bigger
Twetch ·
I don't know if you are joking. Given the returns you really face in other markets at this time, you can just go ahead and loan people money with a fixed interest rate.
Twetch ·
Not joking + @255 seems to have a solution coming for what I was asking for, so lets see what he has
Many people wouldnt take money with a fixed interest rate, but they could "pay back" with a "share" of their personal income. So they have no or less risk
Twetch ·
Loaning money to persons and get paid back in rates + interest would make me a bank
I want to see other solutions than being a bank though
Should be doable via Bitcoin, rest is negotiation
Twetch ·
Back in the ‘90s David Bowie issued bonds on his future performing income.
The individual has to need the capital or want to disperse the risk against their own investment of time. They will ask for a loan first, then after it’s used, think about equity.
Twetch ·
Sounds like you may be looking for a royalty deal. Provide capital to an innovator in return for a share of the top line.
Twetch ·
I would say check out @1623 if you'd like to see the future. Invest in me if you want to. I'll show you results.
Twetch ·
The problem with tokenizing people and their income is that there is no laws to protect the individual from becoming (more) a slave, whereas if a person is incorporated they have limited liability. If I got sick after getting $100K from you, I’d be sued.
Twetch ·
Sure, we would need regulation. But before that, we would need a good technical, preferebly Bitcoin driven solution to actually do that in a convenient way.
Twetch ·
Some dude actually did tokenize himself on Ethereum a few years ago. I remember he ICO’d himself and I can’t remember what the chart was at the time ... here’s another: https://decrypt.co/29070/ethereum-tokenized-man-becomes-synthetic-deepfake
Twetch ·
Rn most are laughing
Wait and see
Twetch ·
This is the right way.
Twetch ·
Not laughing here ... it’s sensible to think about and I’ve thought about it before too. It may become a big thing in the future, for good or bad.
Twetch ·
Google the definition of slavery first before repeating.
Never seen a slave trader asking the slave before hand how much he (the slave) charges
Twetch ·
In a pure libertarian society I think that voluntary slavery would be allowed along the lines you described. However I still don't think it's a good idea.
Twetch ·
sounds like slavery
Twetch ·
There is regulation. It's called corporate law lol. You should read about it.
Twetch ·
No. Companies are groups of individuals cooperating to build a product or service. They are how we work together to achieve more than a single person can do on their own. Your job as investor is to pick the groups of individuals who can cooperate the best.
Twetch ·
Nope
Show me the slave trader who asks the slave how much the slave charges for his work
But have answered all that already
Repeating over and over again what @24 said initially does not make it right or righter
Are we in a cult already or what
Twetch ·
@740 already seems to be working on drafting agreements in the sense I was mentioning in my initial posts rn
Referencing conformity does not answer my question, but I have answered that in plenty posts already
Twetch ·
We were talking about regulation for the model I asked for in my initial post
Not sure why you think I dont know of corporate law
You dont seem to be genuine here, if you want to boomer advice me like that, pay me first as compensation
Twetch ·
If you own somebody else that's slavery even if it was a voluntary sale!
Twetch ·
purchasing slaves is such a last millennia concept, nowadays there are system's in place to create slaves form birth, it is much more reliable system, as any and all contract arrangements were passed by primarily the US administration years ago
Twetch ·
I don't think it's a good idea but here is someone who does:
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=rahimblak.pl
Twetch ·
Not saying this is perfect correlation, but the music industry may look a little like the subject of this discussion. Starts out as respectable contracts between investors and innovators, but turns into subtle slavery. Then Taylor swift has to save both.
Twetch ·
You dont own someone at all if you participate from their income
Just like you dont own a company if you participate from their income/revenue/profits
But we circle around here
Twetch ·
Will have a look
Twetch ·
/trolltoll set @11392 $10