I don't see why intelligence agencies would invent Bitcoin,…
I don't see why intelligence agencies would invent Bitcoin, a terrible threat to the establishment, just to then do everything they can to change it and keep it from being what it was meant to be.
Makes no sense. What am I missing?
Replies
And when it comes to the power to enslave, fiat and CBDCs are orders of magnitude more dangerous in that regard than p2p electronic cash.
I'd say that inside the intel agencies there are also different groups and points of view.
And some of those guys are probably really good at keeping a secret or working in secrecy together, since they fully understand what they are doing and how to defend against the intel agencies they are kinda working for.
And of course there are different intel agencies which may have different point of views as well.
It only needs one person or a handful of people to invent something like bitcoin, so it seems kinda inevitable to me, that at some point something like bitcoin emerges.
Intelligence tends to serve those in power. Those with real power.
Arguably that's their entire raison d'être.
Central control of the money supply is the greatest power in this world, held by those with real power.
No, it is more like "communication manipulation/interruption" or some kind of "man in the middle attack" with all kinds of information transmission.
Money is just one subset of information transmission.
If you control the money supply, you have essentially unlimited funds to manipulate information.
Yes, but in my opinion it is the other way around.
You first manipulate information and get rich and then you can perpetuate.
Take Rothschilds undertaking at the battle of waterloo.
Information/Intel advantage is the stuff you can make money with, blackmail other people and can control everything.
Money is just a byproduct and controling the monetary system is nice but it was caused by having better information in the first place.