Debate about the future of rankings for on-chain content cr…

Debate about the future of rankings for on-chain content creators

▽My Personal Summary
First, as both @ZoideNFT and @metamitya have stated, these types of issues are likely to be resolved through market expansion and an increase in users.
That said, the concern expressed by myself, @pxl272 , and @RosaAmargada —that creators themselves like their own Ordinals, increasing their value and arbitrarily raising their rank within the platform—can be considered merely a drawback of the early days of the platform, and we can reconsider this system as something that should not be eliminated. This is precisely the autonomous, decentralized freedom that is the ethos of web3.
First of all, it's important to remember that the likes (tips) used by @3dordi and ZoidNFT, unlike the free likes on social media, require a cost. Furthermore, this can be considered to have a different meaning from the upvalue and boosts of @treechat , since posts on Treechat are different from Ordinals, which have artistic value.
With that in mind, regarding @J1 Pelaez's concern about "selecting the best 21 Ordinals for the 3D Ordi platform," this is just my personal opinion, but possible ideas include a "one person, one vote" voting system or "distribution of special governance tokens." Alternatively, the management could select the 21 Ordinals in a centralized manner.
There is no absolute right answer, but there is surely an "optimal solution at the moment." I believe that this will be determined through discussion among all of us in the BSV community here.
Thank you for reading to the end.
Please give us your opinion.
https://app.treechat.com/p/9030716f-74c7-4cf8-9abc-b0a8bf6803a8