Does Craigs explanation of the recent signings make sense t…

You won't get many replies. CSW always looks like a fool in court. Ironically he always threatens LAW. He is a fraud.

Keys aren't identity in Bitcoin. For all anyone knows Craig could have written that message himself to make a point.

I get that aspect of it but it was still signed with the private keys. Doesn't prove identify but it was still signed

I think there are two meanings of a signature here, a legal and a cryptographic one. Legally nothing was signed

If CSW came out and actually admitted it was a fraud would you say it's a trick he's playing? I think no matter what certain folks will never give it up.

What matters to me is the protocol & scaling. the CSW stuff is an optical illusion like one of those images where you can see two different things depending on your point of view

It's too bad his phone rang I would have liked to hear more details lol

Fraud or not I find him very interesting to listen to.

I think, to a certain extent, he's play word games to pain things in a way he wants people to see it. Sure, we don't know the identity of the signer, but the message was most definitely signed by someone with access to the private keys of those addresses.

Yes very interesting. Makes your mind gush after awhile. I feel like he never fully explains. Everything gets proceeded by "and whatever else".