Core devs used soft fork in hope to create bigger burgers w…
Core devs used soft fork in hope to create bigger burgers with SegWit. And they call soft fork a proper technique but it doesn’t work as intended. Bitcoiners used hard fork and immediately began creating bigger burgers seamlessly.
Replies
That’s how they hijacked the network and additionally fenced it inwards as well as outwards with a narrative that full non-mining nodes matter more than they do for real.
When sha256 will be broken, will they use a soft fork technique?
Core devs are hypocrites.
When soft fork suits their interests, they will implement changes with soft fork and smear hard forks.
When a hard fork suits their interests, they will implement changes with hard fork and smear soft forks.
Are you talking in code?
This is not a way for bitcoiners.
Bitcoin was set in stone with it’s white paper and first client implementation.
Every imminent threat or upgrade is resolved only with a so called hard fork. Everything else is a sybil attack.
I like burgers 😋😁