The best way to eliminate bureaucracy is by letting everybo…

Probably only possible with a p2p system like BSV.

give me an example

It could be p2p direct action (direct democracy, but I do not like the term). It eliminates centralized points of power. Our current system exists, because in the past we haven't been able to communicate in a scalable and verifyable p2p way. So we had to rely on centralized points of power. BSV probably won't make it completely obsolete, but it will make things more efficient. Those DOGE people want us to keep certain centralized points of power in place which is why they push BTC and make other accomodations. Because they want to keep control it. It is one of the reasons they introduced JFK Jr.. Health advice is one of the things they won't give away, which is why Kennedy is framed "so honest and logical" at the moment. This probably is just temporary. A temporary better alternative to the WHO. He will take over WHO and everyrthing "will be fine" because of "pateiots in conteol". Elon is the Bill Gates of our time in my opinion, similar past and going up. Transparent P2p is the way to go in the future in my opinion. I do not like it to be honest, since I got stuff and habits I am not proud of, but I don't think there is an alternative. Either we use their fucked up manipulated BTC system or transoarent BSV (or something similar). Privacy coins like monero will have a usecase but I am not sure if we can afford to have it as a daily driver.

Oh and obviously patriots could be in control but I think this is too good to be true. I hope so though.

don't bureaucracy minimizing attempts often lead to more bureaucracy?https://x.com/pxl_u_272/status/1856834414216376451

Efforts to minimize bureaucracy can sometimes paradoxically lead to more bureaucracy, and this is a well-documented phenomenon. This can happen for several reasons:

1. **Implementation Complexity**: Introducing new systems or processes to reduce bureaucracy often requires detailed planning and oversight, which can itself become bureaucratic.

2. **Resistance to Change**: Existing structures may resist change, leading to the creation of additional layers of management or oversight to enforce new systems.

3. **Unintended Consequences**: Efforts to streamline processes might overlook certain complexities, leading to the need for additional rules or procedures to address unforeseen issues.

4. **Monitoring and Evaluation**: New systems often require mechanisms to monitor their effectiveness, adding another layer of bureaucracy.

5. **Continual Adaptation**: Bureaucracies may evolve to adapt to new systems, sometimes leading to the creation of parallel processes that increase complexity.

While the goal of reducing bureaucracy is to increase efficiency and responsiveness, it requires careful planning and execution to avoid creating additional bureaucratic burdens.