Does anyone know what the criteria is for @852 censoring Tw…

It appears in this case that the original twetch included a link directly to sensitive documents.

It's one thing to "censor" a report of wrongdoing, it's another to "censor" the wrongdoing itself.

I see no evidence of "censoring" the reports.

The thing is, the post is still available on chain.

It can still be parsed and displayed on other interfaces.

Unlike in almost every other case, "if you don't like it, you can leave" is a viable option here.

The advantage is in using the public ledger as the database for the content.

The folders were removed in ~3 hours.

The censorship happened way after that - probably in last 24 hours, not sure cause not notified.

Maybe Twetch can give us a timeline?

If they were really censoring your reports, they'd be removing a hell of a lot more than just that initial twetch.

You have a conclusion and you're chasing evidence to support that conclusion.