I agree with you. One person, one vote. Also, that a creato…

Thanks.
For example, with social media content like @treechat , adding value yourself to make your posts more visible may be similar in meaning to what @J1 Pelaez Pelaez said: "paying to buy the cover of a newspaper." However, when it comes to Ordinals, which have the nature of "art," it may seem a little strange that the creators themselves can add value. However, the system itself of sending tips by liking, as with @3dordi and @ZoideNFT , is great. Furthermore, even if a system where "likes cannot be made with a minted wallet" is in place, it may be possible to like with a different wallet. Ultimately, it's up to the user（creator）.

i understand how it can seem a bit unfair that a creator can like/boost their own things but this is a problem that gets solved as the audience grows, bc it becomes harder and harder to outvote a bigger and bigger audience, but we are still early, and while we are still "young" it is very useful having a competition among the "boosters" to support the platform, and the higher ranking is a reward for that support! i very much appreciate the early boosters and those who make them work for their ranking! as the audience grows any one user will have less and less influence over the top spots, lets make it happen!

I'm not referring to Treechat. This is primarily a social network, and everyone is free to like other users as much as they like themselves, so that a post they made hours ago is seen by those who are currently active.
I was specifically referring to ordinal markets.

@metamitya Thank you. Very well put, and you've completely grasped the topic! Bravo! 👏