I actually think that when Craig Wright sued Hodlnaught; th…

I didn't see that outcome at first, I thought he was defending his good name, but its pretty clear in hindsight.

You might be thinking.. 'gosh what a troll' and I could understand; but I can explain:

Craig Wright chose his path, of not proving himself, and was called out by idiots like hodlnaught. In suing hodlnaught, BSV is delisted.

In the remedy, CSW gets money.

So this is another way for CSW to extract money from BSV through court.

If he wins, Hodlnaught pays CSW back in cash essentially for binance delisting BSV.

Let me count the approaches which amount to BSV down CSW up

If Craig had been a little angel and attended Sunday school every week, they would have still delisted BSV.

It was a plan looking for an excuse.

Definitely false

100% agree. BSV is the elephant in the room, not CSW. CSW is the excuse but BSV is their concern. The exchanges can’t exist without the speculation circus of the thousands of coins. BSV can replace them ALL as it can do it all infinitely better.

that isnt true now and its questionable if it will become true in the future

How many internet protocols prevailed ? Only 1. There is only 1 internet. The BSV protocol is the ONLY one necessary. It is the ONLY legal one that infinitely scales. All the other coins are simply a distraction and get in the way of true progress.

the timeframe for bsv scaling is so remote that it absolute was not a delisting consideration

How long has it been since Bitcoin’s infinite scalability and legality was restored? Not even 2 years. Yet in that little timeframe, look at all the projects that are starting. We are just getting started and we are already producing 600+ Mb blocks.

it would be wishful at best to attribute the potential of bsv to its delisting.

there are however, direct pieces of evidence that point to Craig Wrights behavior leading to multiple delistings.

They used the CSW narrative/excuse to hoodwink/confuse/distract everyone from seeing the big picture. They knew they HAD TO dissuade developers from jumping onto BSV as it would very soon form the BSV BLACK HOLE that they dreaded & would end their empire.

That is why etherium gained some momentum but it is coming to an end because everyone including developers know that all development efforts on etherium are futile and that development resources would be best spent on INFINITELY SCALABLE & LEGAL BSV.

They would always look for reasons to downplay and distract people from Bitcoin, CSW just happens to be the easiest target. 🎯

Simultaneously however, he draws many to Bitcoin because of interest to see who the heck this “CSW” is.

I agree that they claim that the reason for their delisting is CSW’s behaviour. I don’t dispute that. But there are stronger motives behind that. I don’t think it’s fair to blame behaviour as being the ONLY (or even the main) reason for the delistings.

I would look forward to any evidence presented to the contrary.

I've not found any. I looked.

One thing you need to consider is that when these events occured, I was extremely biased toward CSW and promoted the narrative.

Now, this is my honest review.

I respect your honest review and I can sense your frustration with CSW. I’ll leave it at that. All I want is for all of us to be united. United we stand; divided we fall.