In order for the world "republic" to live, the US (and argu…
In order for the world "republic" to live, the US (and arguably Russia, Iran, Israel) have to die. Harris would have achieved that by continuing in the same direction: gay girl-boss communism. The question now is how a Trump presidency will achieve that same goal. The possibilities are endless. Escalate war with Iran (Russia), financial/economic meltdown, mass-protests, or simply a false flag that turns Trump into a real dictator (you know he'd fall for it) like a dirty bomb in a major city, followed by martial law and a new "war on terror". https://youtu.be/avVAoU68Sc0?feature=shared
Replies
Once again we are in the situation where the liberals are largely right about the conservatives (and MAGA) and the conservatives are largely right about the liberals, which isn’t exactly difficult.
Trump is indeed normalizing troops on the streets. Whether he fell into a trap (useful opposition) or does it on purpose (controlled opposition) is irrelevant.
Once again the controllers achieve their goal quite elegantly:
If Kamala Harris or Hillary Clinton had done the same thing, conservatives (the armed population) would have screamed tyranny and maybe even resisted.
Instead we now have conservatives arguing in favor of military in the streets. And yes, so far nothing terrible has happened and the use of the National Guard seems rather benevolent and justified, but that's always the first step, if you do it right.
"Just the tip!"
The dark Trump arc is becoming increasingly clear now. He is openly talking about committing war crimes, he is wrecking the world economy (this is probably part of the agenda just like taking out Iran) and we are one (false flag) terrorist attack from him going full dictator bringing millions to the streets (at the command of the establishment).
All of this will not weaken the establishment, but the opposition.
The establishment will come out of this with all kinds of solutions for the problems created.
And that is exactly what controlled opposition is there for.
This was planned since the Iran Contra scandal. The Pope will come out the undisputed world leader after he brow beats the English speaking world to submit to slavery by scaring them about climate change and fear of capitalism.
Everybody thinks.
The question is whether or not our thinking is based on principles and universal ethics, or just narratives that justify our actions.
When we adopt an ideology it is almost guaranteed that we don't think for ourselves, but swallow a narrative hook, line and sinker that was crafted by others.
But even thinking for ourselves is by no means a guarantee that it is based on (the search for) truth. The default here is also situational ethics, not universal ones.
The amount to which our own mind deceives us cannot be overstated.
Unless we put in a lot of work, we always end up with glaring double standards:
"It's fine when we do it."