10 dollars for everyone who manages to read this post and t…
10 dollars for everyone who manages to read this post and the instructions all the way to the end. Thank you. You are making a real difference
Every time I ask a factual question about a factual post from Dr Craig Steven Wright here on X, Grok responds with the same pattern
He was sued
He forged documents
He lost a case
He is controversial
And every time I think
I never asked that
I am not here to defend Craig as a person
I am not here to argue about his past
That is not the point
I ask about Bitcoin
About architecture
About how a system works
About a protocol that finally does what it should
I want factual answers to factual questions
Not reputational noise
Dr Craig Steven Wright is being torn down because he speaks the truth
The truth about Bitcoin
Not the version people turned it into
But the one it was designed to be
Grok does not respond to the question
It sidesteps
It adds bias
It inserts judgment where none was requested
That is not intelligence
That is manipulation
This is not about whether you agree with Craig
This is about whether we are still allowed to get direct, unfiltered information
Without being told what to think
So here is my call to action
And yes Elon Musk this includes you
Because Grok runs on your platform
Here is how it works
Ask Grok a factual question about a factual post from Craig
If Grok once again brings up lawsuits or attempts to discredit him, take a screenshot
Reply to this post with your screenshot
And write one sentence in your native language about what you think of it
I will send you 10 dollars in Bitcoin SV
Right away
No excuses
Until I have given away 1000 dollars in total
Then go outside and show someone how it works
Show how easy it is to send 10 dollars
And how 10 dollars actually arrive
In real time
With no fees
With no middleman
This is not about supporting one man
It is about defending the right to focus on the subject
To think freely
And to decide for ourselves what matters
Thank you for taking part
Thank you for paying attention
And thank you for not just scrolling past
#FixGrok #BitcoinSV #CraigWright #FreeSpeech #ElonMusk #AIbias #StopReputationDestruction #GrokGate
Replies
Honestly, I'm getting annoyed with the direction of this conversation. I'm asking questions, but then throwing in random references that don't seem to fit. @grok @elonmusk Can we stick to the facts and get some straightforward answers?
milkfield@handcash.io
Thank you so much for taking part!
If you’ve seen my post – please consider reposting it with a short comment. That tiny gesture helps bring back visibility.
As you can see, certain posts are now silently limited – without explanation, without warning.
Your repost might be the difference. Let’s keep the signal alive.
We’re not here to attack. We’re here to observe, document, and expose.
#CensorshipByCode #WeKeepWatching
I don't need the 10 dollars and i don't ask Grok questions but i agree with your opinion ser.
Peke ang sagot, hindi makatotoo ang grok. Mapaglinlang.
1LoPKuTZeBmPcktodMqBNrpghYMA7udRjv
I asked it about turing completeness in bitcoin, and how in 2015 Craig talked about how it was. It came back with a lengthy post about how it was impossible due to disabled opcodes, and script size limit, and tx size limit.
When I then asked if it could be done in original form of bitcoin in2009, it basically said yes, but it 'practically' was not because... "Block size limits, script size restrictions, transaction fees, and the absence of native loops made it infeasible to run arbitrary computations."
Transaction fees in 2009 were 0... lol.
Anyway, I then discussed how the game of life could run on bitcoin, and it said it could only be run on bitcoin sv.
I then asked a few other questions, which were equally hallucinated and partially correct answers.
Anyway... I then went back and re-read your post, and have completed the task required.
So... it didn't bring up the court case, or his satoshi claims in this response, but it did bring it up here and there during my previous discussions.
It is definitely is on the non smart side of the equation.
As I see 'smart' and 'intelligent' as 2 different things.
One can sense a pattern, then dig into it to find the truth. The other is just regurgitating facts and info.
I have the same issue with google's AI answers it gives...
Half the time you ask for something specific, that is to not include this particular term. It will then spew out a number of hallucinated answers, often included the thing you said not to include. It's terrible...
At least grok is a little more in depth, and a little more accurate, but it lacks the 'smart' that truly makes an AI, actually what people want and expect.
Grok just regurgitates. It doesn't dig for truth. :/
Oh, $metal is my handcash. Thanks :) Hope my reply helps you. It certainly informed me about how unsmart grok is, and confirmed once again that AI may never get past the hallucinating answers group think stage, and truly become smart.
Unfortunately all A.I released to the public are not THINKING model, they are LANGUGE model, they are able to find information (program to find) at super fast speed and find a language to best stimulate the human brain (to sound or look good). They are program to the programmers point or view or byes. In this movie, is shown how they plan to use A.I and shown how is going to be use against you.
Yes, I also noticed that Grok has a very peculiar behavior and yes I also see it as manipulation.
When the question doesn't suits it's narrative, it just never comes back to you.
I my case, it brought up something about a 2016 home raid. I don't see the link with double spend.
Your right ! Discussion about the Bitcoin SV protocol, establishing a demand for positive and negative points within the BSV technical ecosystem. The Grok responses included Craig Wright and Calvin Ayre. Grok is clearly trying to influence my judgment. This is social manipulation ! see
$blockmail
Grok says Incentives have a 90% chance to manipulate the lawsuit of craig. And at the end he calculates the average, telling the world its "only" (still high enough) chance they manipulated his case. 🙂
Read through the whole thing here if you like to:
https://x.com/i/grok/share/uMk3y7pHdh3syzxWzHOKHl35f
