19gAUDU4VQoVuLgeL9pwTepPsZonqvALhv (678) ·
@8085 just watched your video on the bcash governance.
Why do you ignore the third option, BSV?
Stable protocol. cannot be changed. Miners are incentivized to increase throughput and therefore are paying devs to do that.
Replies
19gAUDU4VQoVuLgeL9pwTepPsZonqvALhv (678) ·
why do you think bitcoin needs governance. at all? I don't want governance in my decentralized money. That is the whole idea. 100 masternodes or 21 whale delegates is a farce.
The federal reserve is more decentralized tbh
19gAUDU4VQoVuLgeL9pwTepPsZonqvALhv (678) ·
leaving governance to major exchanges, chinese whales and code monkeys is a sure way to failure in my opinion
13qZ6nzjcTQ8nCeYFcZUwkAH6n1od35fXf (17128) ·
If there's an unchanged and stable protocol, what the hell is Shadders doing with his time?
19gAUDU4VQoVuLgeL9pwTepPsZonqvALhv (678) ·
he was working to unfuck bsv from all the … the core devs and bch devs put in. That culminated in restoring Bitcoin with Genesis.
Now they are working on teranode to scale to gigameg blocks. This is extremely important work and paid by miners
19gAUDU4VQoVuLgeL9pwTepPsZonqvALhv (678) ·
set in stone doesnt mean literaly no changes. Best way to describe it is there will NOT be any changes that break anything existing as of now.
Only exception would be to restore the DAA when bsv has significant hash and that is universaly accepted in bsv