@6368 Did you read the article? Did you understand it? Do …
@6368
Did you read the article?
Did you understand it?
Do you know that @24 is Daniel Krawitz?
Do you still think, after reading the article, including the references under it, that Daniel has no clue about economics?
PS: I studied economics in Vienna
https://twetch.app/t/a84b1cbd223457e48b31325dc0d2aeaa9a6db720c411a7ceca90e06c8f6af14a
Replies
Glad you enjoyed! p. s. my name is "krawisz"
@6368 likes Marx. He may never learn to seek profits, sadly!
has no clue about economics? what? my (mild, passing) critique is that the analogy is inaccurate .. also it's very overused, you can't just keep coming back to the same analogy tree to pick every day, it's picked over
I doubt if you think for even a moment you really believe that what socialists are like is that we haven't "learn[ed] to seek profits," that's absurd. :/ Everyone tries to profit from their work. Capitalists (NOT YOU, CAPITALISTS) use violence to NOT work.
Sorry, sorry, 🙏
Krawitz is a popular name in Vienna, where I grew up. I was thinking about it, but was just too lazy to check and make sure, not to interrupt what I was writing.
Also because it's difficult to get back in Twetch to where you were before
Capitalism means "private ownership of the means of production". Capitalists are people who want capital goods to be privately owned. My capital goods will out-profit your capital goods!
That's not the sense of the word capitalist that I meant in what you're responding to. And I specified which sense of the word I meant. So there's no genuine confusion here whatsoever. You know you're not a capitalist! Nobody works for you, non-capitalist.