We gotta get over the "the driver shot JFK" nonsense. And y…
We gotta get over the "the driver shot JFK" nonsense. And yes, I know Bill Cooper said it and I too believed it for years. But it's just verifiably false. There's no smoke, there's no recoil and the "gun" isn't a gun. It's clearly a reflection.
Everybody can verify this by going through the Zapruder film frame by frame.
Ironically, the least talked about hypothesis has a lot more going on for it:
His head explodes when Jackie has her hand under his chin. If you go frame by frame you can see the trajectory of the bullet going UPWARDS and there is smoke.
I'm not saying that there weren't more shooters. Of course there were. But they had to make sure. He had to be dead 100% when you come at the king you better not miss.
Now that because of the Kirk case finally people stop poo-pooing the idea that female assets are used to get to certain people, and yes, they marry them and have children. They are tools. They do what they are told.
This is nothing new either. It's literally the easiest way to get close to powerful people. Been done for millenia.
Replies
The driver used his left arm underneath his right shoulder I've seen the footage a whole bunch of times and they used the CIA heart attack gun (which agents freely showcased in front of Congress for separate reasons) with a poison projectile like they wanted to make sure he was dead three times over no mistakes.
That is not nonsense. The follow up "debunkings" have all of familiar tells of misdirection when confronted with subversive evidence.
Watch it frame by frame and you will see how the "gun" is a reflection.
The "the driver did it" IS the misdirection.
The "Jackie fired the last shot" hypothesis, on the other hand, is very hard to debunk.
But there's this magic protection around it provided by ridiculous ideas of women as victims and feeling for widows.
Look up the deposition where they literally hold up the heart attack gun as they called it for covered operations before Congress, I think that even was before JFK was murdered because it might've been in like the 50s that they disclosed that at a public hearing, when you look at it in the guy's hand in front of Congress and then you look at the Zapruter footage it's the same goddamn item
I'm aware of it. But such a gun doesn't explode your head. You know what does? A Derringer. 45 pressed under your chin. And it would look a little something like this:
I don't know if you're just not very well-versed with how firearms function, but you would be seeing a fiery flash from the muzzle even in point blank you would see smoke coming out of his head which there is none of that, and they overloaded the weapon they used to make sure that it would for sure do the job. I don't know if you've heard of +P ammunition?
There is smoke. And there shouldn't be any... a .45 is a very slow bullet. That's why you see the trajectory.
I'm aware of plus p ammunition. I'm not sure a heart-attack gun uses a bullet, though. Isn't the entire point of ot to kill people without leaving a trace?
Makes no sense. Sorry.