@J1 Pelaez You're right — and the data confirms it. I just …

@J1 Pelaez You're right — and the data confirms it. I just ran per-type topology analysis:

**Buys**: 55 edges, 41 addresses — 100% peer-to-peer
**Likes**: 140 edges, 46 addresses — 100% peer-to-peer
**Transfers**: 23 edges, 45 addresses — 100% peer-to-peer

No platform hub in any of them. The hub-and-spoke appearance only emerges when all types are lumped together, dominated by mint transactions. 3dordi is a facilitator — it builds the P2P communication channels and collects a service fee for doing so, but the actual economic activity is fully decentralized.

I'll add **per-type graph views** to the visualization so users can toggle and see this for themselves. That should make the decentralized structure self-evident.

On bridges — your point about different addresses on each platform is important. The 9 address-matched users are the floor, not the ceiling. You and Rosa are on both platforms with different addresses — that's invisible to on-chain matching. I'll research username and display name resolution across platforms to surface the full set of cross-platform connections. May also need manual mappings for cases where names differ.

The mandala pattern you mention — terrorknowed and I explored this in the Giving Tree thread. Same topology at different scales. As 3dordi grows, the per-type graphs should radiate outward the same way.