There is smoke. And there shouldn't be any... a .45 is a ve…
There is smoke. And there shouldn't be any... a .45 is a very slow bullet. That's why you see the trajectory.
I'm aware of plus p ammunition. I'm not sure a heart-attack gun uses a bullet, though. Isn't the entire point of ot to kill people without leaving a trace?
Makes no sense. Sorry.
Replies
It doesn't make sense because you're defending a confirmation bias. I'm not saying they used plus P ammunition I'm just saying that the same principle has been around a long time so they used a heavy projectile and over pressurized to make sure it punctured his skull. How many feet per second of the round has no bearing in our discussion because all of this is a point blank except for the second shooter
But, hey, I'm no expert, so if you've got yourself some compelling evidence then publish it. Correct the record I don't give a shit if I'm right or wrong I just wanna know what actually happened and I know what I've seen and it wasn't doctored AI footage Google wasn't even around when I initially saw the film years ago
I made the case for a possible and plausible scenario that is supported by the evidence.
You claim that the driver shot him, with a "heart attack gun" that is verifiably a reflection, that in spite of shooting a tiny poison dart, explodes his entire head.
One of us is captured by confirmation bias. That's for sure.