The suicided pedo had sponsored Bitcoin development before …
The suicided pedo had sponsored Bitcoin development before BSV forked from BCH and before BCH forked from BTC. So the mark of the Pedo has tainted BTC, BCH, and BSV.
Replies
as BSV's protocol remains 0.10, you would have to explain to me how this "development" has tainted same. As for BTC and even BCH, you may have a point.
Oh right... Do you think these Network Access Rules (NAR) are in line with version 0.10: https://nar.bsvblockchain.org/network-access-rules/background-to-the-rules
I'm new to treechat and didn't notice your reply until now. How much are the epstein cabal paying you for this? You might think that's a deflection, but I'd really like to know. I ask because this tactic is happening right now on twitter also. It does like this:
Epstein funded massive changes for a rational person would assume aided his pedo/blackmail operation.
BTC as a result is so wildly different from the whitepaper so as to be onrecognizable.
You completely ignore 1 and 2 and run straight to NAR. That's not reason, debate or rationality, that's just tactics. So who pays you?
Unfortunately I'm not getting paid to post here. It'd be really nice to get paid after investing in BSV and developing with BSV since 2018 or 2019, but maybe that's too much to ask... unless someone is funded by sugardaddy Calvin, like you. 😉
Cute, I'm not funded by anyone for anything.
Read the whitepaper, NAR is part of it. I find it ridiculous that OP discussions of Epstein influencing Core changes like Segwit, Lightning and Taproot get responses omitting same and talking about NAR. If NAR was a divergence from the 0.10 protocol then it would still be a comparison between a penny and a pound, but it's not a divergence. Hence my assumption of trolling as the NAR topic popped up at exactly the same time in exactly the same way in my twitter mentions.
Glad to hear you're not paid.